July 11, 2026 09:24 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Foreign franchise league enters India! BBL opener to be played in Chennai, announce Modi-Albanese | 'They could have stopped me': Vijay blames police, former DMK government over Karur stampede | 'People will correct their 2025 mistake': Electoral debutant Prashant Kishor predicts BJP defeat in Bankipur | New assassination plot against Trump? Israel's secret intelligence raises alarm amid escalating Middle East tension | Ayatollah Ali Khamenei buried at Iran's holiest shrine as Middle East crisis deepens | Indian techie allegedly kills wife in US, sends photo of her body to 'secret girlfriend' in India; arrested | 'I fled the city': Thane doctor quits after alleged assault by Shiv Sena leader | Sensex surges 500 points before losing steam, ends marginally higher after volatile trading session | US court drops charges against Indian-origin doctor who drove Tesla off 250-foot cliff with family | Dalal Street bleeds! Sensex tanks over 1,600 points after Trump declares Iran ceasefire 'over'
Covid-19 origin
Image Credit: Pixabay

New study claims lab leak behind SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus: Reports

| @indiablooms | May 30, 2021, at 01:47 pm

Moscow/Sputnik: UK Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Birger Sorensen have conducted a study claiming to have proven that the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus had laboratory origin, the Daily Mail reported on Saturday, citing the study it has obtained.

The research obtained by the outlet is a 22-page article that will be published in the coming days in the scientific journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery.

The study alleges that Chinese scientists developed SARS-CoV-2 in a Wuhan laboratory, after which they made attempts of "deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data" to make the virus appearance look natural, transmitted from bats. Beijing has repeatedly denied such accusations.

In particular, the authors of the study said they found several features of the coronavirus that represent "unique fingerprints" indicating that "purposive manipulation" took place, and, given the fact that "the likelihood of it [virus] being the result of natural processes is very small," it was thus made by "laboratory manipulation".

According to the outlet, the scientists tried to publish their findings earlier, but major scientific journals, confident in the natural origin of the virus, refused their research.

Even when the head of the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) Richard Dearlove called on the scientists to investigate the theory, their opinion was still regarded as fake news, the outlet added.

In early 2021, the WHO sent a fact-finding mission to the Chinese city of Wuhan where the virus was first detected, to identify the origin of COVID-19 by examining laboratories, hospitals, and markets for clues about the virus’ origins.

The experts concluded that a leak from the lab was "extremely unlikely," while the virus was most likely transmitted to humans from bats through an intermediary animal. A related report was published in March.

However, Washington, jointly with 13 other nations expressed concerns about whether Beijing communicated all raw data on the coronavirus to the WHO after media reports that the organization's investigators were denied access to data on more than a hundred early cases of COVID-19.

The states branded the WHO report as incomplete, while China denied all allegations and welcomed the results of the probe.

President Joe Biden has ordered the US Intelligence Community to redouble efforts to investigate the origins of the virus and to report their findings to him in 90 days.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.