July 07, 2026 12:58 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
China tests ballistic missile from nuclear submarine in Pacific: Australia, New Zealand respond | Baruipur horror: Main accused in alleged rape and murder of minor girl arrested; senior cops dissatisfied with handling of the case | Defence stocks jump after Rs 52,000 crore DAC approval sparks buying frenzy | 'Harry Kane is a great player': Donald Trump after England knocked Mexico out of the World Cup | 'Referee gave a lot against us': Harry Kane reacts after England's dramatic win over Mexico | England hold nerve with 10 men to knock out Mexico in five-goal World Cup classic | 'Why can't citizens protest against the government? They are being made slaves by slapping cases': Bombay HC slams Mumbai Police, quashes activist's externment | 'First he cheats on me...': Siya Goyal's old pub video goes viral amid probe into fiancé Ketan Agarwal's alleged murder | Ronaldo's goal, Ramos' last-gasp winner send Portugal past Croatia, set up Spain clash | India-US trade deal almost done! Piyush Goyal hints at breakthrough

Book on 'Sahara' released by former SEBI chairman

| | Jun 10, 2014, at 09:15 pm
Mumbai, Jun 10 (IBNS): Former SEBI chairman M. Damodaran on Tuesday released a controversial book Sahara – The Untold Story, penned by veteran banking sector reporter and Deputy Managing editor of 'Mint' Tamal Bandyopadhyay, here.

The book reveals several facts, incidents and opinions which were never in public and also satisfies many curiosities about Sahara Group especially in the light of the ongoing Sahara and SEBI case.

In his book Tamal Bandyopadhyay noted that the RBI had reconstituted the Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd’s board in July 2008 and appointed three independent directors – H N Sinor, former MD of ICICI Bank, Chartered Accountant TN Manoharan and 1970 batch IAS officer Arvind Jadhav.

Bandyopadhyay said, "If we just look back in 2008, it would be evident that Sahara once repaid 18,000 crore rupees to four crore investors under direct supervision of the Reserve Bank of India and no debate was there about the authenticity of investors."

"The board did not come across a single complaint of a customer losing money and there was not even a single case of violation detected even after the board tightened the KYC norms," Bandyopadhyay added.

"Photographs were taken of all depositors, branches were audited and random checks, technically called in-person verification were conducted, but not a single case of violation was detected,” the author quoted HN Sinor.

In the book, Bandyopadhyay mentioned, the independent directors of SIFCL board received the full cooperation of the Sahara Group.

Even Subrata Roy himself made it a point to attend most of their board meetings, the author noted.

Interestingly, some of the money that was being repaid to investors was finding its way back into Sahara Group companies and that signifies the faith of depositors on the group.

The book quotes one of the leaders of Indian banking sector, Sinor as saying that Sahara was a “unique lab of financial inclusion: It inculcated the habit of savings in poor people.”

The book said that by the time Manoharan and Sinor resigned in October 2011, SIFCL’s deposit liability came down to about Rs. 2,000 crore and net owned funds rose to Rs. 3,000 crore.

This may again be a proof that the investors who had put money with the company were not fictitious, Bandyopadhyay said.

Bandyopadhyay further mentioned in his book that had the regulators not entangled him; Roy would have done wonders in India.

He added that Sahara had just the right and well-entrenched model for financial inclusion, which has now become the mantra of both government and RBI.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.