May 23, 2026 10:22 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Big twist in RG Kar case! Calcutta HC orders fresh probe into evidence destruction allegations | Pulwama mastermind Hamza Burhan shot dead in PoK by unknown gunmen: Reports | NIA arrests Kolkata man for spying for Pakistan intelligence network | Cockroach Janta Party X handle withheld! Founder Abhijeet Dipke launches comeback account | Bengal govt makes Vande Mataram compulsory in all madrasas, extends school directive | RBI on alert! Interest rate hike may be coming as rupee crashes to fresh low | Big relief for Maharashtra employees! Fadnavis govt hikes DA to 60% | Twisha Sharma death mystery deepens as crucial evidence ‘not shared’ during autopsy: Report | Balcony Smiles, Colosseum Walks and ‘Melodi’ Magic: Modi-Meloni Chemistry Has The Internet Swooning Again | Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial
Delhi Riots
Umar Khalid (L) and Sharjeel Imam (R) are accused in the 2020 Delhi riots. Photo: Umar Khalid/X, SC website & Sharjeel Imam/Facebook

Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial

| @indiablooms | May 18, 2026, at 02:14 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Monday expressed strong reservations over its earlier judgement denying bail to former Jawaharlal Nehru University student leaders Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the Delhi riots conspiracy case, media reports said.

 

The apex court reaffirmed the principle that “bail is the rule and jail is the exception” even in cases registered under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Court questions dilution of precedent

A bench comprising Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan observed that the previous judgement denying bail appeared to dilute the binding precedent laid down by a larger bench in the landmark Union of India vs KA Najeeb case.

“They cannot dilute, circumvent or disregard binding precedent,” Justice Bhuyan said, as quoted by NDTV.

Earlier bail plea was rejected

In January this year, a Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and N. V. Anjaria had rejected the bail pleas of Khalid and Imam.

The court had then cited material on record indicating their alleged involvement in a criminal conspiracy and said it was satisfied with the prosecution’s submissions suggesting a prima facie case against the two accused.

Delhi riots conspiracy case

Khalid and Imam are accused under the UAPA in connection with the alleged “larger conspiracy” behind the communal violence that erupted in Northeast Delhi during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act protests.

The accused had approached the Supreme Court challenging a Delhi High Court order denying them bail and later filed special leave petitions against the decision.

The apex court had reserved its verdict on December 10, 2025.

2020 Delhi violence

The violence had broken out in the national capital during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), leaving 53 people dead and more than 700 injured.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.