December 30, 2025 01:19 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh’s first female Prime Minister Khaleda Zia passes away at 80 | India rejects Pakistan’s Christmas vandalism remarks, cites its ‘abysmal’ minority record | Minority under fire: Hindu houses torched in Bangladesh village | Supreme Court puts Aravalli redefinition on hold amid uproar, awaits new expert committee | Supreme Court strikes! Kuldeep Sengar’s bail in Unnao case suspended amid public outcry | From bitter split to big reunion! Pawars join hands again for high-stakes civic battle | CBI moves Supreme Court challenging Kuldeep Sengar's relief in Unnao rape case | Music under attack: Islamist mob attacks James concert with bricks, stones in Bangladesh, dozens hurt | Christmas vandalism sparks mass arrests in Raipur; Assam acts too with crackdown on 'religious intolerance' | BJP's VV Rajesh becomes Thiruvananthapuram Mayor after party topples Left's 45-year-rule in city corporation
Electoral Bonds
Photo Courtesy: UNI

Cong demands reply from PM Modi, Home Minister Shah on electoral bonds

| @indiablooms | Mar 18, 2024, at 12:32 am

New Delhi: The Congress on Sunday demanded a reply from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah on the electoral bond issue.

Addressing a press conference at the AICC headquarters in the national capital, party general secretary Jairam Ramesh asked, "Where did this money come from and whose money is it? The Home Minister has to reply on electoral bonds."

The party pointed out that a company with reported profits of Rs 20 crore bought electoral bonds worth Rs 400 crore and questioned the legitimacy of such a transaction.

Ramesh alleged that electoral bonds were "clearly a route for money laundering".

He said the companies gave crores of rupees to BJP through electoral bonds, using "donate and take business, extortion, pay bribe and take contract and create shell company and donate".

The Congress leader accused the BJP-led government of conducting a 'surgical strike' on Congress by freezing its bank accounts and rendering it 'economically handicapped' through 'tax terrorism'.

He said, "We went to the Tribunal but did not get any relief. We went to high court and there, too, we did not get any relief. We will now approach the Supreme Court."

He also questioned the duration of the Lok Sabha polls, saying that seven stages meant the Prime Minister gets more time to campaign.

On the Election Commission, the Congress leader said, "The Election Commission is a Constitutional body whose job is to conduct free and fair elections. But for the last 10 months, the leaders of the INDIA alliance have been seeking an appointment with the EC on issue of VVPAT. But we have not been given time.

"We are not against the EVMs but against the Electronic Voting 'Manipulation'. We just want the VVPAT to be matched 100 percent," he said.

On a question on ED issuing fresh summons to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, the Congress leader said, "For the last four to five years, ED has been misused. Opposition parties have been made a scapegoat. ED, CBI, and IT are being used by the government, when they see threats from the Opposition. These agencies have become BJP's frontal organisations," he said.

Ramesh also informed that on Tuesday the party will have a meeting of its Manifesto Working Committee and the manifesto will be released.

He added that the guarantees given by party president Mallikarjun Kharge were from the party manifesto.

(With UNI inputs)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.