February 05, 2026 04:47 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Justice crying behind closed doors’: Mamata Banerjee slams ECI in Supreme Court, CJI Kant assures solution | Mummy, Papa, sorry: Three sisters jump to death after parents object to online gaming | Supreme Court raps Meta, WhatsApp: ‘Theft of private information, won’t allow its use’ | ‘Completely surrendered’: Congress slams Modi after Trump’s trade deal move | PM Modi thanks 'dear friend' Trump for tariff reduction, hails strong US–India partnership | Trump announces US–India trade deal, lowers reciprocal tariffs to 18% | After Budget mayhem, bulls return: Sensex, Nifty stage sharp recovery | Dalai Lama wins first Grammy at 90 | Firing outside Rohit Shetty’s Mumbai home: 4 arrested, Bishnoi Gang link emerges | Female suicide attackers emerge at centre of deadly BLA assaults that rocked Pakistan’s Balochistan
SIR
Supreme Court issues a number of directives to ECI over SIR. Gemini recreation of images sourced from Mamata Banerjee/Facebook, SC website, IBNS and ECI/Facebook

Jolt to ECI over SIR! SC allows BLAs at hearing, questions 'logical discrepancy'; TMC declares 'BJP's game over'

| @indiablooms | Jan 19, 2026, at 04:35 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court’s intervention in the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process has handed West Bengal’s ruling Trinamool Congress a major political boost ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls.

The apex court on Monday directed the poll panel to conduct verification of voters flagged under the “logical discrepancies” category in a transparent and citizen-friendly manner.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Dipankar Datta and Joymalya Bagchi ordered the Election Commission to publish the list of voters who had received notices under this category.

The court noted that nearly 1.25 crore people had been served such notices, a move that had drawn sharp criticism from the TMC, which alleged that the SIR exercise was being used to disenfranchise genuine voters in the poll-bound state.

In relief for the affected voters, the bench ruled that those who received notices would be allowed to submit documents or objections through authorised agents, including Booth Level Agents (BLAs).

The court also directed that verification centres be set up at Panchayat Bhavans or Block offices so that people are not forced to travel long distances for hearings. If documents were found inadequate, officials must provide another opportunity for hearing, and receipts of submissions must be duly certified.

Addressing law-and-order concerns, the bench asked the state government to provide adequate manpower to the Election Commission and held the Director General of Police responsible for maintaining peace during the process.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for TMC petitioners, argued that even voters whose names were already part of the draft electoral roll had been issued notices on flimsy grounds such as variations in surname spellings or age gaps with parents of less than 15 years.

Justice Bagchi questioned the logic behind treating such cases as discrepancies, remarking that a 15-year age gap between mother and child could not automatically be deemed irregular, particularly in a country where child marriage remained a reality.

Reacting to the order, TMC national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee described the verdict as a decisive setback for the BJP. He alleged that nearly one crore names had been targeted for deletion and that the court had protected the democratic rights of Bengal’s people.

“The BJP’s SIR game is over. Our voting rights were being threatened, but the Supreme Court has given them a firm rebuke,” Banerjee said, adding that the courtroom defeat would soon be mirrored in the ballot box.

In a fiery statement invoking Bengal’s historical legacy, he asserted that the state had never bowed before outsiders and would resist any attempt to undermine its democratic voice.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.