December 16, 2025 09:30 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Goa nightclub fire horror: Luthra brothers brought back to India from Thailand, arrested | Messi chaos costs minister his job: Aroop Biswas resigns after Salt Lake Stadium fiasco | Bengal SIR draft list out: Around 58 lakh voters’ names dropped | Relief for Sonia, Rahul Gandhi as Delhi court refuses to act on ED chargesheet in National Herald case | Centre moves to replace MGNREGA with 'G Ram G', sets stage for winter session showdown | Messi surrounded by VIPs, fans rage: Five held in stadium vandalism case | 'Messi was uncomfortable, lost his cool!': Ex-India footballer reveals what really happened at chaotic Kolkata stadium | PM Modi embarks on historic three-nation visit to Jordan, Ethiopia, and Oman | Caught in Thailand! Fugitive Goa nightclub owners detained after deadly fire kills 25 | After Putin’s blockbuster Delhi visit, Modi set to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in January
Nayanthara
Nayanthara in the Netflix documentary | Photo: Nayanthara/X

Nayanthara's Netflix docu in fresh trouble as Madras HC asks makers to respond to use of Chandramukhi clips

| @indiablooms | Sep 10, 2025, at 02:25 pm

Chennai/IBNS: In a fresh trouble for Tamil superstar Nayanthara, the Madras High Court on Wednesday asked the makers of her Netflix documentary to respond to a plea filed against the usage of clips from blockbuster film Chandramukhi, media reports said.

The documentary, which was released on November 18, 2024 coinciding the actress' 40th birthday, was developed in association with Rowdy Pictures, the production banner co-founded and run by Nayanthara and her husband Vignesh Shivan. 

AB International, which owns the copyright of Chandramukhi, has accused the makers of the documentary Nayanthara: Beyond the Fairy Tale of using clipping from the Rajinikanth-Jyothika starrer film without taking any permission.

Nayanthara played a key role in Chandramukhi, which was released in 2005.

The film's makers alleged that the documentary is still streaming on the popular OTT app with the particular clippings despite serving a legal notice demanding the removal of the sequences and Rs. 5 crore in damages, NDTV reported.

The Chandramukhi makers had filed the plea seeking a court order seeking restrain on Tarc Studios from using the clippings, removing them from the documentary and furnishing the details of the money generated as profits.

While Tarc Studios claimed it was participating in a dialogue with AB International to resolve the dispute, the Chandramukhi makers trashed such assertions.

The Madras HC has asked Tarc Studios to file its response by October 6, when the next hearing will be held.

Earlier, the release of the documentary was embroiled with controversy after Dhanush, who was the producer of the film Naanum Rowdy Dhaan, slapped a legal notice against Nayanthara and demanded Rs. 10 crore as compensation from the actress for using a clip of the film in the show's trailer.

Nayanthara responded with a fiery three-page open letter on Instagram, expressing shock at the demand for Rs 10 crore over "mere three seconds" of footage, which she claimed consisted of behind-the-scenes (BTS) visuals shot on personal devices.

In her letter, Nayanthara criticised Dhanush for what she called an "all-time low" and stated her intent to respond legally.

She alleged that Dhanush had repeatedly refused permission to include songs or visuals from Naanum Rowdy Dhaan in the documentary despite multiple requests.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.