February 23, 2026 09:23 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘No systemic risk’: Sanjay Malhotra breaks silence on ₹590 crore IDFC First Bank Limited fraud | India urges all nationals to leave Iran 'by available means' as US-Iran tension grows | India shines at BAFTA! All you need to know about Manipuri film Boong that stunned global cinema | Mamata Banerjee’s former right-hand man and ex-Railway Minister Mukul Roy dies after prolonged illness | Rahul Gandhi slams Modi as ‘compromised’, says PM can’t renegotiate India-US trade deal | Terror alert in Delhi: LeT may target Chandni Chowk with IED, say reports | US Supreme Court shocks Donald Trump on tariffs — but India may still end up paying more | PM Modi warns ‘AI must not control humans’ as India unveils bold tech vision at AI Impact Summit 2026 | Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol sentenced to life over failed martial law bid | Tata Group joins hands with OpenAI in massive AI push to transform India and global industries
K Kavitha
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia commons

Supreme Court asks K Kavitha to approach trial court for bail

| @indiablooms | Mar 23, 2024, at 02:04 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to hear the bail petition of K. Kavitha, MLC of Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) and daughter of former Telangana CM K Chandrashekhar Rao, and told her to approach the trial court for bail.

A bench comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice MM Sundresh, and Justice Bela Trivedi, while hearing the petition of K. Kavitha, challenging her arrest by the ED concerning the Delhi Excise Policy case, issued notice to the Directorate of Enforcement (ED).

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for legislator K. Kavitha, requested the court, saying: “Please don't tell me to go back to the High Court. Hear it, decide it against me; I do not mind. But see what is happening in our country.”

Sibal contended that every statement made against Kavitha is from an approver; there is not a single piece of evidence. "It is contrary to this court's order.”

He also cited the example of former Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren and asked what was happening in the trial court. This cannot happen.

The bench said that it is a practice that this court is following and cannot bypass statutory remedies merely as the politician is involved.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.