July 12, 2026 05:02 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Highway blocked, stones pelted, cops injured': BJP faces open revolt in Madhya Pradesh over Narottam Mishra ticket snub | Two Kolkata Police DCPs suspended over alleged remarks against Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari | Bail to Bloodbath: Telangana man allegedly kills wife, kids and teen who accused him of sexual harassment | Prakash Raj gets bail in multiple voter registration case linked to 2019 polls | ED raids Shekhar Suman associate's premises in FEMA case; phone allegedly thrown from 13th floor | 'Candidate fled': Prashant Kishor jibes BJP over Bankipur nominee change | BJP replaces candidate days before high-stakes Bankipur bypoll | Foreign franchise league enters India! BBL opener to be played in Chennai, announce Modi-Albanese | 'They could have stopped me': Vijay blames police, former DMK government over Karur stampede | 'People will correct their 2025 mistake': Electoral debutant Prashant Kishor predicts BJP defeat in Bankipur

Supreme Court refuses to put stay on citizenship law, gives Centre four weeks to respond

| @indiablooms | Jan 22, 2020, at 12:59 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: Refusing to put an interim stay on the new contentious citizenship law, the Supreme Court on Wednesday gave four weeks' time to the Centre to respond to the 80 odd new petitions challenging the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA).

During the hearing, Attorney General KK Venugopal, who was arguing for the Centre, said the government was given the copies of only 60 of 143 petitions so it needs more time to respond.

The Supreme Court on Dec 18 had refused to put a stay on the CAA, which aims to grant citizenship to Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Parsi, Jain but not Muslim refugees who came to India from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh before 2015, issuing a notice to the Centre over 60 petitions filed against the new law.

Advocate Kapil Sibal, who was representing Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) (one of the petitioners) in the court, on Wednesday urged the top court to put an interim stay on the law as the Centre has already started the process of the CAA in Uttar Pradesh.

However, the top court refused to put a stay and said hearing will resume after five weeks from now.

The top court has also said a batch of petitioners raising the issue of Assam will be heard separately. People of Assam are opposing the grant of citizenship to any refugee who came to India from the three neighbouring countries irrespective of his religion.

The Opposition parties and the protesters against the law, which has been notified by the Union Home Ministry effective from Jan 10, are accusing the ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of violating the Constitution by hurting the secular fabric of the nation. 

Apart from the IUML, Congress, DMK, CPI, CPI-M, AIMIM, Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra, Kamal Haasan's MNM had also filed petitions which were heard by a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India Sharad Arvind Bobde.

The hearing took place amid the nationwide protests against the CAA. Over the last one month, the country saw various students protests with few of them turning violent.

After Assam, violent protests were witnessed by West Bengal, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh.

Meanwhile, the protesting students of Jamia Millia Islamia University were allegedly assaulted by Delhi Police and later a similar attack took place on the students of Aligarh Muslim University in Uttar Pradesh.

At least 20 people were killed in protests which took place in Uttar Pradesh.

Remaining firm on his stand, Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Tuesday said anyone can continue with his protests but the government will not revoke CAA. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.