June 30, 2026 06:25 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Dharmendra Pradhan will be responsible if anything happens': CJP warns as Sonam Wangchuk's health worsens on day 3 of hunger strike | Adani Ports seals $1.4 billion mega deal as MSC buys 49% stake in Vizhinjam port | Ram Temple donation scam: Former trust chief Champat Rai grilled by SIT for 2 hours, says report | Brazil escape Japan scare, Germany crash out as Paraguay script World Cup shocker | India overtakes Taiwan, South Korea to become world's fifth-largest equity market again | Pakistan strikes terror hideouts near Afghan border after Karachi bloodshed, 29 killed | Israel strikes back: Top October 7 militant “eliminated” in precision operation | Radharaman Das, who defended Bengal's vegetarian mid-day meal plan, loses ISKCON post | Fresh paper leak rocks India: Maharashtra TET postponed a day before exam, over 4 lakh aspirants affected | Pune fort murder case: Siya Goyal's brother says family would have called off marriage if she had objected
Godhra Riot

Supreme Court reserves order on Zakia Jafri's plea in Godhra case

| @indiablooms | Dec 09, 2021, at 06:56 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its verdict on the Zakia Ahsan Jafri petition that sought fresh probe into the 2002 post-Godhra Gujarat riots alleging larger conspiracy involving politicians and police.

A three-judge bench of the apex court headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar reserved the judgement after hearing a detailed argument from Jafri, SIT and others.

Zakia, the wife of slain MP Ehsan Jafri, had moved the Supreme Court challenging the clean chit by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to then Gujarat Chief Minister, Narendra Modi, in the riots cases.

Raising a number of questions on the manner in which the SIT had probed these riots cases in Gujarat, Kapil Sibal, senior lawyer for Zakia Jafri, questioned the SIT's action "despite all kinds of evidences and documents against all the accused persons in these riot cases in Gujarat".

Senior lawyer and former Attorney General (AG) of India, Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the SIT, maintained that the probe team had conducted its investigation in a detailed manner and refuted the allegations by Sibal that the SIT failed in its duty to investigate the accused persons role in the Gujarat riots cases.

A three-judge bench led by Justice Khanwilkar has been hearing the case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.