December 30, 2025 03:12 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Amit Shah blasts TMC over border fencing; Mamata fires back on Pahalgam and Delhi blast | 'A profound loss for Bangladesh politics': Sheikh Hasina mourns Khaleda Zia’s death | PM Modi mourns Khaleda Zia’s death, hails her role in India-Bangladesh ties | Bangladesh’s first female Prime Minister Khaleda Zia passes away at 80 | India rejects Pakistan’s Christmas vandalism remarks, cites its ‘abysmal’ minority record | Minority under fire: Hindu houses torched in Bangladesh village | Supreme Court puts Aravalli redefinition on hold amid uproar, awaits new expert committee | Supreme Court strikes! Kuldeep Sengar’s bail in Unnao case suspended amid public outcry | From bitter split to big reunion! Pawars join hands again for high-stakes civic battle | CBI moves Supreme Court challenging Kuldeep Sengar's relief in Unnao rape case

US keen to know if F-16 jets were used by Pak during Feb 27 misadventure

| @indiablooms | Mar 04, 2019, at 10:49 am

New Delhi, Mar 4 (UNI) Fresh diplomatic and strategic woes seemed to be mounting on the Imran Khan-led dispensation as the United States is now keen to ‘confirm’ whether F-16 fighter jets were really used by Pakistan during their Feb 27 misadventure against India.

“We take all allegations of misuse of defence articles very seriously,” a spokesman of the US embassy in Pakistan has been quoted as saying in western media amid India providing ‘evidence’ about the same and Pakistan seemingly desperate to prove it otherwise.

“We are aware of these reports and are seeking more information,” the US official has been quoted with the remarks attributed to a popular western news agency.

In Delhi, the ruling BJP sources say things are being closely followed as the developments have been going according to Government of India’s “wishes and fact”.

“Pakistan’s double speak and hesitation is palpable. They are denying using F-16. But are they specifying which other plane was used? The season of trouble seems to have started,” said a key government source on the condition of anonymity.

Pakistan on Feb 27 initially put up a brave face about its striking ability.

“Today, Pakistan Air Force undertook strikes across the Line of Control,” the Pakistan foreign said on February 27 in one of its first statement after dogfight adding, “Sole purpose (of the strike) being to demonstrate our right, will and capability for self defence”.

But after Indian Air Force officials on Thursday displayed parts of what they called an air to air missile, Islamabad has come under pressure to deny as there are broad hints that such strikes by Pakistan against India was ‘abuse’ of F-16 and violation of the ‘end users’ code and trade agreements from the US manufacturers.

A senior BJP leader Vinay Sahasrabuddhe, meanwhile, lauded the manner the Modi government’s foreign policy engine room has handled the entire post Pulwama and post-Feb 26 air strike on JeM terror camp.

“This is a huge and remarkable success for India. As a student of international relations I can say that the Government of India’s achievement in making the world see its actions in proper perspective is remarkable,” Sahasrabuddhe said.

The ruling dispensation in India is aware of the fact that Pakistan has brought several batches of F-16 planes, built by US-based Lockheed Martin Corp and thus all eyes are on whether Pakistan really violated the ‘end user’ clauses.

Image Credit: Donald Trump Instagram

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.