July 11, 2026 04:14 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Foreign franchise league enters India! BBL opener to be played in Chennai, announce Modi-Albanese | 'They could have stopped me': Vijay blames police, former DMK government over Karur stampede | 'People will correct their 2025 mistake': Electoral debutant Prashant Kishor predicts BJP defeat in Bankipur | New assassination plot against Trump? Israel's secret intelligence raises alarm amid escalating Middle East tension | Ayatollah Ali Khamenei buried at Iran's holiest shrine as Middle East crisis deepens | Indian techie allegedly kills wife in US, sends photo of her body to 'secret girlfriend' in India; arrested | 'I fled the city': Thane doctor quits after alleged assault by Shiv Sena leader | Sensex surges 500 points before losing steam, ends marginally higher after volatile trading session | US court drops charges against Indian-origin doctor who drove Tesla off 250-foot cliff with family | Dalal Street bleeds! Sensex tanks over 1,600 points after Trump declares Iran ceasefire 'over'

World Bank safeguards 'go out of their way' to avoid references to human rights – UN expert

| | Dec 18, 2014, at 03:14 pm
New York, Dec 18 (IBNS) The United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston, on Wednesday urged the World Bank to recognize the central importance of human rights to its draft environmental and social policies, also known as safeguard policies, which apply to its investment project financing.

In a joint letter to World Bank President Jim Yong Kim,  Alston and 27 other rights experts highlighted specific concerns with the proposed new safeguards policies, which were released by the Bank in July for public consultation, as part of the multi-stage review.

“The draft safeguards seem to go out of their way to avoid any meaningful references to human rights,”  Alston stressed in a news release.

“The Bank’s position is effectively a sleight of hand,” he noted. “They insist that their operations will be ‘supportive of human rights’ but then add that this must be ‘in a manner consistent with the Bank’s Articles of Agreement,’ and they have interpreted the latter as preventing human rights being taken into account because they are inherently political.”

According to the expert, Bank officials have defended its increased reluctance to engage with human rights on the basis that alternative sources of development financing are emerging, which do not require meaningful safeguards.

“The failure of other lenders to require that projects they fund should protect human rights standards is not a valid reason for the Bank to follow suit,”  Alston said. “The risk of a race to the bottom is real and would be disastrous for sustainable development.

“I believe that honouring this promise requires a significantly different approach from that which is now being pursued by the Bank. The draft is a backward step that tramples upon the progress achieved over the last thirty years or so.”

The UN experts noted that the draft safeguards also fail to meet the standards that international human rights law sets, for instance in the area of labour and working conditions, involuntary resettlement and indigenous peoples. In addition, many vulnerable groups, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans/transgender and intersex people as well as people with a physical or mental disability, remain virtually unprotected in Bank projects.

The UN Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.