March 19, 2025 10:56 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin discuss ways to end Ukraine war in a two-hour call | 'The controversial ruler died 300 years ago': Uddhav Thackeray questions row over Aurangzeb's tomb | Maha Kumbh showed unity in diversity: PM Modi in Parliament | Think twice before travelling outside US: Indians with H-1B, F-1 visas, green cards warned by immigration attorneys | Mamata Banerjee visits Furfura Sharif, slams Opposition for questioning her intent ahead of 2026 polls | Left, BJP call Mamata's Oxford University invitation fake PhD deja vu, TMC hits back | Violence breaks out in Nagpur over call to remove Aurangzeb's tomb, Fadnavis appeals for peace | Ballet dance between dragon, elephant is the only choice: China after Modi's 'positive' remarks in Lex Fridman podcast | PM Modi meets Tulsi Gabbard, discusses ways to enhance cooperation for tackling terrorism | Trump, Modi are focused on strengthening shared interests of India and US: Tulsi Gabbard
China
Wallpaper Cave

China reluctant to approve loan to Pakistan citing mounting debt

| @indiablooms | May 09, 2021, at 03:59 am

Expressing concern over Pakistan’s growing debt, China has shown reluctance to approve USD 6 billion loan for the Mainline-I (ML-I) railway track -- the single largest project under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor -- according to the record of a meeting and senior Pakistani officials, Express Tribune reported.

The construction of ML-1 project in three phases had been approved by the Executive Committee of the National Economic Council (Ecnec) in its meeting held in August last year. The actual cost of the project was USD 9 billion initially, including the equity amount of the government of Pakistan. But later, it was reduced gradually to USD 6.8 billion.

“Beijing conveyed its concerns during a meeting held on March 30 to discuss financing modalities of the project,” the officials said.

Moreover, the officials said China also termed the total project cost of USD 6.8 billion at the lower side, which Islamabad is now willing to increase further by 15 percent or USD 1 billion, the report said.

The sources said that in the last meeting, Chinese authorities were wary of Pakistan’s ability to service its debt. The concerns have now also been reflected in the meeting records.

“The Chinese side have sought clarification regarding the possibility of raising further debt by Pakistan during the currency of the IMF program. The Pakistani side clarified that the debt situation is being monitored and there is no restriction under the program to raise debt for viable projects,” Deputy Chairman Planning Commission Dr. Jehanzeb Khan told The Express Tribune while responding to a question.

Chinese authorities also showed their reservations over restrictions imposed by Group 20 nations and the International Monetary Fund which, in Beijing’s view, could undermine the ML-1 project, according to discussions that take took place in the last ML-I Financing Committee meeting held on March 30th.

China also highlighted the dilapidated financial condition of Pakistan Railways that do not allow it to take $6 billion new debt on its books.

The negotiations to secure the loan have been going on for the last over one year but so far no conclusion has been reached. The project is facing delays of over three years against the original schedule agreed between the two countries.

Pakistan has asked for a 25-year repayment period, including a 10-year grace period.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu