November 14, 2024 22:01 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
AAP councillor Mahesh Khinchi wins MCD election to become Delhi Mayor | Delhi air pollution: GRAP-3 curbs start tomo; construction works banned, primary schools shift to online mode | We should not become the most polluted city in the world: Supreme Court was told as smog chokes Delhi | Toxic smog engulfs Delhi as air quality remains severe, over 200 flights delayed | ED conducts multiple raids in Kolkata in 'lottery scam' case
SpiceJet promoter Ajay Singh denied anticipatory bail in fraud case
Ajay Singh

SpiceJet promoter Ajay Singh denied anticipatory bail in fraud case

| @indiablooms | 01 Apr 2022, 02:05 am

New Delhi: A sessions court in Delhi refused to grant anticipatory bail to SpiceJet promoter Ajay Singh on Thursday in case of a fraud involving a few lakh rupees.

The court cited the gravity of the offence alleged against Singh in the case for denying anticipatory bail to Singh, reported MoneyControl.

A spokesperson of Spicejet said, "Mr. Ajay Singh, as per the Hon’ble Court’s directive, has already joined the investigation and appeared before the authorities. Therefore, no warrant or bail is relevant since these were to ensure his attendance."

"Mr. Singh will continue to extend full cooperation in the matter to bring this frivolous and mischievous complaint to a close," the statement issued by SpiceJet further adds.

However, non-bailable warrants against Singh were issued as he failed to appear before the investigating agency probing the case.

The court took into consideration the observations by Supreme Court which stated that "granting anticipatory bail at the stage of investigation may frustrate the investigating agency in interrogating the accused and collecting useful information and also material which might have been concealed."

The FIR against Singh has been transferred to the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police which will now investigate the case.

The case involves two share-purchase agreements entered into between Singh and the family members of the complainant for the transfer of a total of 25 lakh fully paid-up shares of SpiceJet.

This transfer was not executed on account of expired Delivery Instructions Slips (DIS).

While it is Singh's case that the DIS was handed over to the complainant as security under bona fide understanding that the same will not be presented, the complainant alleged that Singh gave outdated and invalid DIS dishonestly, the MoneyControl report stated.

The court terms the issue of giving invalid DIS as a "serious and grave offence" and basis the gravity of this offence, and proceeded to reject Singh's anticipatory bail, the report said.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.