November 05, 2024 10:55 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pakistan's Lahore has become world's most polluted city with an AQI of 1900 on Sunday | Indian Army 'successfully completes' patrolling to a key point in Ladakh's Depsang region | US presidential election: Donald Trump ahead of Kamala Harris in swing states, poll survey predicts | 'I strongly condemn Hindu temple attack, intimidation of our diplomats': PM Modi amid Canada row | 'I strongly condemn Hindu temple attack, intimidation of our diplomats': PM Modi amid Canada row
Sockpuppets manipulated content, removed warnings on Adani Group on website, claims Wikipedia: Report
Wikipedia

Sockpuppets manipulated content, removed warnings on Adani Group on website, claims Wikipedia: Report

| @indiablooms | 22 Feb 2023, 01:30 am

Through a period of over a decade, sockpuppets added non-neutral content and removed warnings from information, creating a 'puffery' around tycoon Gautam Adani, his family and the port-to-airport group, Wikipedia has alleged, reported media.

The free online encyclopaedia has alleged some of these false online identities belonged to Adani Group employees, a report in the media said.

This follows the US short-seller Hindenburg Research report accusing the group of accounting fraud, stock price manipulation, and money laundering.

The report published just ahead of Adani Group’s flagship company Adani Enterprises Rs 20,000 crore follow-on public offer (FPO), triggered a massive decline in the stock prices of the listed companies of the conglomerate.

In a matter of a month, Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani lost over USD 70 billion in net worth and slipped to 25th rank on the world billionaire index from being Asia's richest and the world's third most wealthy businessman.

Accordng to the media report, Wikipedia in a February 20 'Disinformation Report' referred to the "con" alleged by Hindenburg, to ask "Did he (Adani) and his employees also try to "con" Wikipedia readers with non-neutral PR versions of related Wikipedia articles?"

Wikipedia has responded this question in the affirmative, said the report. "Almost certainly they did," was Wikipedia’s response, it said.

"Over 40 later banned or blocked sockpuppets or undeclared paid editors created or revised nine related articles on the Adani family and family businesses. Many of them edited several of the articles and added non-neutral material or puffery," Wikipedia said.

Wikipedia alleged, listing IP addresses that edited information on Adani, his wife Priti, son Karan, nephew Pranav and the group companies, the report stated.

According to the report, Wikipedia has said that a write-up on Adani was began in 2007 in "a straightforward style" but by 2012 three editors, who were later blocked or banned as sockpuppets or undeclared paid editors, had edited the information on "the philanthropy section, made a few reverts, and removed a warning tax".

"A declared paid editor, using a company IP address, completely rewrote the Adani Group article. Others removed warnings about conflict-of-interest editing. Some created articles by unusual methods that avoided Wikipedia's quality control systems," it said.

Wikipedia, however, did not provide the information that was added by the sockpuppet.

"Perhaps the most concerning finding is that Hatchens, an article for creation reviewer, was banned for abusing his position and possibly corruptly approving several Adani articles. He edited seven of the nine articles examined," it added.

Wikipedia said billionaires have a history of apparent undeclared paid editing on Wikipedia, according to the report.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.