December 24, 2024 07:02 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Allu Arjun quizzed by police in Pushpa 2 stampede case | Wanted Indian drug smuggler killed in the US | Congress leader files complaint against Allu Arjun for 'insulting police' in Pushpa 2: The Rule | Ahead of Jaishankar's US visit, foreign secretary Vikram Misri meets top US diplomats | India refrains from commenting on extradition request for ousted Bengladeshi PM Sheikh Hasina | I don't blame Allu Arjun, ready to withdraw case: Pushpa 2 stampede victim's husband | Indian New Wave Cinema Architect Shyam Benegal dies at age 90 | Cylinder blast at a temple in Karnataka's Hubbali injures nine people | Kuwait PM personally sees off Modi at airport as Indian premier concludes two-day trip | Three pro-Khalistani terrorists, who attacked a police outpost in Gurdaspur, killed in an encounter
Image Credit: File image by Jimmy Vikas via Wikimedia Commons

Hindenburg Research attacks market regulator SEBI, reveals it made small gain with last year's Adani short-selling event

| @indiablooms | Jul 02, 2024, at 10:38 pm

New Delhi: Hindenburg Research criticised India’s market regulator for not addressing the alleged fraud in its report on the Adani Group from early last year, stating it gained just over $4 million from the short-selling event that led to a massive market downturn for the conglomerate, Bloomberg reported.

Securities and Exchange Board of India, or SEBI, “seems more interested in pursuing those who expose such practices” while its probe into billionaire Gautam Adani’s empire has hit a wall, the US short-seller said in a statement on its website Monday.

In June, SEBI issued a notice stating that Hindenburg’s scathing January 2023 report on the Adani Group contained certain misrepresentations and inaccurate statements intended to mislead readers.

The report generated nearly $4.1 million in gross revenue from Adani shorts through an unnamed investor relationship and around $31,000 from Hindenburg’s own short of Adani U.S. bonds, according to a July 1 statement from Hindenburg.

Last year, Hindenburg accused the ports-to-power conglomerate of extensive corporate misconduct, calling it "the largest con in corporate history." Despite the Adani Group's consistent denials, the following stock market crash wiped out over $150 billion in market value from its listed companies. However, the Adani Group has since recovered most of these losses.

Hindenburg claimed that SEBI’s notice “conspicuously failed to name the party that has an actual tie to India: Kotak Bank,” which oversaw the offshore fund structure used by Hindenburg’s investor partner to short Adani.

The regulator allegedly concealed the name "Kotak" using the acronym "KMIL," which stands for Kotak Mahindra Investments Ltd., the asset management company, it said.

“Sebi has neglected its responsibility, seemingly doing more to protect those perpetrating fraud than to protect the investors being victimized by it,” Hindenburg said in the statement.

After Hindenburg’s Adani report, the Supreme Court ordered SEBI to investigate accusations while forming an expert panel to look into regulatory gaps.

In January this year, the top court directed SEBI to conclude its investigation within three months and stated that no further probes were necessary.

Hindenburg’s latest attack comes as India’s newly rejuvenated opposition parties have been criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for crony capitalism, accusing him of favouring billionaires like Adani and Mukesh Ambani over ordinary citizens during a heated parliamentary standoff this week.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.