December 13, 2024 15:59 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengaluru techie suicide: Karnataka Police issues summons to wife Nikita, her family members | French President Macron appoints centrist leader Francois Bayrou as new Prime Minister | Congress always prioritised personal interest over Constitution: Rajnath Singh | Jaishankar calls attack on Hindus in Bangladesh 'a source of concern' | Allu Arjun arrested over woman's death in stampede during Pushpa 2 premiere show | RBI receives bomb threat in Russian language, case filed | UP teenager kills mother, lives with body for 5 days | At least six people including a child killed in Tamil Nadu hospital fire | Amid Atul Subhash row, SC says mere harassment is not enough to prove abetment to suicide | India's D Gukesh becomes youngest ever world champion in chess
Senior lawyer and former Attorney General of India Mukul Rohatagi says US indictment against Adanis lacks specificity. (Photo courtesy: Video grabs)

Mukul Rohatgi dismisses bribery claims against Adani Group, questions lack of specifics in US indictment

| @indiablooms | Nov 28, 2024, at 02:02 am

New Delhi: Senior lawyer and former Attorney General of India Mukul Rohatgi refuted allegations against the Adani Group, stating that its founder chairman, Gautam Adani, and his nephew, Sagar Adani, have not been accused of bribery or obstructing justice in the US, media reports said.

Speaking to the media, Rohatgi addressed what he described as misleading reports regarding the US Department of Justice indictment, reported NDTV.

"At the outset, I want to tell you that these are my personal legal views. I am not a spokesman for the Adani Group. I am a lawyer. I have been appearing for the Adani Group in several cases. I have gone through this indictment by the US court. There are five charges.

"It is very important to note that Count 1 and Count 5 are more important than the others. But neither in Count 1 nor Count 5 is Mr Adani or his nephew charged. This is like a chargesheet that charges individuals for specific acts. Count 1 is against certain other persons minus the two Adanis.

"It includes some officers and one foreign person. The first allegation is there is a conspiracy to violate the (US) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In that, the Adanis are not named," he was quoted as saying by NDTV.

Rohatgi clarified that while the Adanis are mentioned in counts related to securities and bonds, they are not named in the count concerning obstruction of justice.

"In Count 5, which relates to obstruction of justice, the Adanis and their officers are not named. The Adanis and others will respond to this chargesheet in the manner that they desire, they will also respond to stock exchanges. These are my personal views after taking a look at this chargesheet," he explained.

He also raised concerns about the lack of specificity in the indictment document.

"When you look at a chargesheet, it must be specific to say that so and so has done such and such act, so and so has bribed certain individuals. But I do not find a single name or detail in the chargesheet as to who has been bribed, in what manner, and which department he belongs. This chargesheet is completely silent.

"I don't know how one can respond to this kind of chargesheet. But I am sure the Adanis will take legal opinion from US lawyers," he added.

In an interview with NDTV, Rohatgi further noted that the charges lacked detail.

"It is not written who was bribed, how much bribe was paid and which contract it was paid for. I can't say if they will share more information later, but these papers have no mention of the amount of bribe or who it was paid to," he said.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.