December 12, 2024 17:45 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Amid Atul Subhash row, SC says mere harassment is not enough to prove abetment to suicide | India's D Gukesh becomes youngest ever world champion in chess | Devendra Fadnavis meets PM Modi amid suspense over Maharashtra portfolio allocation | Congress wants to deviate the issue of Sonia Gandhi-George Soros link: JP Nadda | Bengaluru techie suicide: Atul Subhash's family demanded Rs. 10 lakh as dowry leading to my father's death, claims estranged wife | Syria rebels torch tomb of ousted president Bashar al-Assad's father | Donald Trump vows to eliminate birthright citizenship after taking charge | No alliance with Congress in Delhi polls: AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked
Digital Banks

Niti Aayog proposes idea of 'full-stack' digital banks, seeks comments

| @indiablooms | Nov 25, 2021, at 04:52 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Government think tank Niti Ayog has proposed setting up of “full-stack" digital banks to solve and mitigate credit penetration challenges by utilising the unprecedented level of technology-led digitization and digital disruption in the country.

The Aayog released a discussion paper “Digital Banks: A Proposal for Licensing & Regulatory Regime for India” seeking comments till December 31.

The discussion paper makes a case and offers a template and roadmap for a Digital Bank licensing and regulatory regime for India.

The Discussion Paper can be accessed on the NITI Aayog website.

It recommends regulatory innovations such as Digital Bank license that hold the promise of solving for as well as mitigating the financial deepening challenges faced, Niti Aayog said in a statement.

The paper starts by defining the concept of “Digital Bank” and points out the promise it holds while mapping the prevalent business models.

It goes on to highlight the challenges presented by the “partnership model” of neo-banking that has emerged in India as a function of regulatory vacuum and absence of a Digital Bank license.

In terms of the methodology for licensing and regulatory template offered by NITI Aayog, the Paper constructs an equal-weighted “Digital Bank Regulatory Index” comprising of 4 factors: entry barriers; competition; business restrictions, and technological neutrality and maps the elements of these indices against the five benchmark jurisdictions of Singapore, Hong Kong, United Kingdom, Malaysia, Australia and South Korea.

The paper also recommends a two-stage approach with a Digital Business Bank license to begin with a suggestion for Digital (Universal) Bank license after policymakers and regulators have gained experience from the former.

It focuses on avoiding any regulatory or policy arbitrage and giving a level playing field is an important recommendation.

Moreover, even with the Digital Business Bank license, it recommends a carefully calibrated approach comprising of following steps:

  • Issue of a restricted Digital Business Bank license (to a given applicant) (the license will be restricted in terms of volume/ value of customers serviced and the like).
  • Enlistment (of the licensee) in a regulatory sandbox framework enacted by the RBI.
  • Issue of a “full-stack” Digital Business Bank license (contingent on satisfactory performance of the licensee in the regulatory sandbox including saliently, prudential and technological risk management).

The discussion paper has been prepared by NITI Aayog, in consultation with eminent experts in the field of finance, technology and law and based on inter-ministerial consultations.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.