April 20, 2024 03:54 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Had mangoes only three thrice, sweets 6 times in jail': Arvind Kejriwal counters ED claims in court | 'Opposition got donations through bonds, is that extortion as well?' Amit Shah slams Rahul Gandhi | Millions of Indians vote in the biggest phase of Lok Sabha polls, 60.03 pct turnout recorded | India votes in first phase of Lok Sabha elections, approximately 60 percent voting recorded across 102 seats till 5pm | Maldives opposition demands President Muizzu's impeachment over leaked reports alleging corruption by him

Study finds GPs are unwilling to refer patients for bowel cancer checks

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 22 Sep 2017, 03:57 pm
London, Sept 22 (IBNS): GPs can be reluctant to refer patients with symptoms of bowel cancer for further investigations, a study by the Universities of Birmingham and Exeter has found.

In 2015 the University of Birmingham led the CREDIBLE study, which investigated the feasibility of using electronic patient records to flag up those aged between 60 and 79 needing urgent referral for symptoms of bowel cancer – also known as colorectal cancer. The symptoms are set out by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines and include persistent diarrhoea, iron deficiency anaemia, rectal bleeding, or a test showing blood in the stool – also known as positive faecal occult blood tests (FOBt).

As part of the CREDIBLE study, the authors interviewed GPs and practice managers at 18 GP practices in Britain to explore attitudinal and contextual influences on GPs in their decisions to refer patients.

Professor Tom Marshall, of the University of Birmingham’s Institute of Applied Health Research, said: “Our data indicates that GPs in our study were often reluctant to refer patients for a variety of reasons.

“In some cases, they were aware of pressure to avoid over-referral and wished to avoid being identified as having a high referral rate.

“Some GPs considered that referral would scare patients and weighed this against a low perceived risk of cancer.

“Before referring, some GPs therefore required additional evidence: their own suspicion of cancer, or clinical features such as weight loss, positive FOBt results, or bowel symptoms. NICE red flag symptoms alone were not regarded as sufficient.

“Anaemia was often perceived as common and therefore not always warranting investigation.”

She said that due to a lack of familiarity with referral guidelines, some GPs used personally devised decision rules and diagnostic strategies which hindered further investigation.

From the data, the researchers identified two groups of patients that may be at greater risk of non-referral: minority ethnic groups with anaemia, because GPs sometimes attributed this to diet, and patients with anxiety, which GPs sometimes believed could be exacerbated by a referral.

Professor Marshall added: “Healthcare commissioners should support and encourage GPs to refer patients meeting urgent referral criteria for cancer.

“Further research could test the belief that anaemia is less predictive of colorectal cancer in minority ethnic groups.

“Research also is needed to identify the strategies most likely to promote referral. This could include drawing attention to the need to increase referrals, highlighting practices that refer too few patients and making GPs aware that most symptomatic patients prefer to be investigated. Particular attention may be needed on strategies to increase referral thresholds for overly-anxious patients.”

Professor Willie Hamilton, at the University of Exeter Medical School, a practicing GP, said: “Britain still has a much higher rate of cancer deaths than the rest of Europe, and this paper is important in identifying areas where the GP can get it wrong, so we can identify opportunities to do better. This is essential as early diagnosis saves lives. However, it’s important to note that we are making progress - UK cancer survival figures are continually improving.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.