December 13, 2024 00:57 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
UP teenager kills mother, lives with body for 5 days | At least six people including a child killed in Tamil Nadu hospital fire | Amid Atul Subhash row, SC says mere harassment is not enough to prove abetment to suicide | India's D Gukesh becomes youngest ever world champion in chess | Devendra Fadnavis meets PM Modi amid suspense over Maharashtra portfolio allocation | Congress wants to deviate the issue of Sonia Gandhi-George Soros link: JP Nadda | Bengaluru techie suicide: Atul Subhash's family demanded Rs. 10 lakh as dowry leading to my father's death, claims estranged wife | Syria rebels torch tomb of ousted president Bashar al-Assad's father | Donald Trump vows to eliminate birthright citizenship after taking charge | No alliance with Congress in Delhi polls: AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal
Sugar
Photo Courtesy: Pixabay

Low-sugar diet in early childhood can reduce lifetime risk of chronic disease like diabetes, reveals study

| @indiablooms | Nov 06, 2024, at 03:11 pm

A low-sugar diet in the first years of life can significantly reduce the risk of chronic diseases in adulthood, a study based on historical data has found.

The researchers pulled data from UK Biobank, focusing on adults conceived just before and after the 1953 end of wartime sugar rationing in the United Kingdom.

The study, published in Science, indicated that children exposed to sugar restrictions during their first 1,000 days, including pregnancy in utero, had up to a 35-per-cent-lower risk of developing Type 2 diabetes and up to 20-per-cent-lower risk of hypertension as adults. Surprisingly to the researchers, in-utero exposure alone was enough to lower risks.

The study – led by the University of Southern California in collaboration with the University of California Berkeley and McGill – provides some of the first compelling human evidence of the lifelong effects of early sugar intake.

Yesterday’s ration, today’s guideline

While rationing was in effect during the Second World War and several years afterward, sugar intake was less than 40 grams per day for adults and none for children under two. When rationing ended, consumption skyrocketed. The stark contrast gave researchers a clear snapshot of sugar’s effects.

“What’s fascinating is that sugar levels allowed during rationing mirror today’s guidelines. Our study suggests that if parents followed these recommendations, it could lead to significant health benefits for their children," said co-author of the study, Claire Boone, Assistant Professor in McGill’s Department of Economics and the Department of Equity, Ethics, and Policy.

Health Canada recommends little to no added sugars for children under two. There are strict limits on sodium and food additives for infants, but there are no regulations on sugars.

‘Natural experiment’ shows long-term effects

Boone said studying nutrition is notoriously difficult because it’s hard to control diets over long periods of time and track outcomes accurately.

“That’s why there is so much conflicting dietary research out there,” she said.

“This natural experiment allows us to see the long-term effects of sugar intake in a real-world setting, providing the public with a much clearer picture.”

She noted that as public debates continue about measures like sugar taxes and tougher regulations on sugary foods marketed to infants and toddlers, the study’s findings add to mounting evidence showing how important early diet is for lifelong health.

Boone added that the next phase of research will explore how sugar early in life could affect inflammation and cancer risk.

The study was supported by the U.S. National Institute on Aging.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.