December 12, 2024 17:04 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Amid Atul Subhash row, SC says mere harassment is not enough to prove abetment to suicide | India's D Gukesh becomes youngest ever world champion in chess | Devendra Fadnavis meets PM Modi amid suspense over Maharashtra portfolio allocation | Congress wants to deviate the issue of Sonia Gandhi-George Soros link: JP Nadda | Bengaluru techie suicide: Atul Subhash's family demanded Rs. 10 lakh as dowry leading to my father's death, claims estranged wife | Syria rebels torch tomb of ousted president Bashar al-Assad's father | Donald Trump vows to eliminate birthright citizenship after taking charge | No alliance with Congress in Delhi polls: AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked
China
Image: UN website

More transparency needed in investigating coronavirus origins: WHO Director-General Tedros

| @indiablooms | Jun 15, 2021, at 12:42 am

London/UNI: Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has called on China to cooperate on the ongoing investigation into the origins of the novel coronavirus.

"As you know we will need cooperation from the Chinese side," Dr. Tedros said on Saturday, as quoted by The Wall Street Journal, after G7 summit talks. "We need transparency to understand or know or find the origin of this virus… after the report was released there were difficulties in the data sharing, especially in the raw data," he added.

According to the director-general of the WHO, G7 leaders discussed the causes of the pandemic on Saturday and preparations are underway for the next phase of the investigation into the origins of COVID-19. More cooperation and transparency is expected from China, Dr. Tedros said.

Conservative advocacy group Judicial Watch said on Thursday that there were two lawsuits, one against the US State Department and the other against the Director of National Intelligence, seeking to uncover US information on the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. Last week, an earlier Judicial Watch lawsuit uncovered Department of Health and Human Services records showing the US government gave $826,277 to the Wuhan institute from 2014 to 2019 for research on coronaviruses endemic in bats.

Judicial Watch said it filed the latest lawsuits because it does not trust the administration of US President Joe Biden to voluntarily disclose possible connections between the novel coronavirus and the Wuhan facility.

Biden recently ordered the US intelligence community to produce a report re-examining the origins of the novel coronavirus and to help determine whether the disease leaked from a lab or spread from an infected animal to a human.

China continues to call the laboratory-leak theory a conspiracy.

In January, international experts traveled to Wuhan where they examined a laboratory, hospitals and markets for clues on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The expert mission of the World Health Organization (WHO) then compiled a report, saying that a leak of the new coronavirus from a laboratory in Wuhan was very unlikely. The report, released in March, said that the new virus was most likely transmitted to humans from bats through an intermediary host. After the publication, Dr. Tedros said that China had withheld data from international experts during their visit to Wuhan.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.