December 22, 2024 12:58 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Mohali building collapse: Death toll rises to 2, many feared trapped for 17 hours | 4-year-old killed after speeding car driven by a teen hits him in Mumbai | PM Modi attends opening ceremony of Arabian Gulf Cup in Kuwait | Jaipur gas tanker crash: Toll touches 14, 30 critical | Arrest warrant against former cricketer Robin Uthappa over 'PF fraud' | PM Modi emplanes for a visit to Kuwait | German Christmas market car attack leaves 2 dead, Saudi Arabian doctor arrested | India, France come together to build world's largest museum in Delhi's Raisina Hill | Canada, US presented no evidence of Indians' involvement in purported criminal acts: Centre informs Parliament amid 'serious allegations' | Delhi Police Crime Branch to investigate FIR against Rahul Gandhi over Parliament tussle

Union Minister echoes Greenpeace's concerns on pesticide residue in tea

| | Aug 21, 2014, at 09:32 pm
New Delhi, Aug 21 (IBNS): Expressing serious concern on the issue of pesticides residue in tea, Union Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, in a recent media interview, raised questions on the safety of consumers.

Greenpeace India siad it urged the Indian tea companies not to hide behind regulations, but look towards real solutions of Non Pesticide Management (NPM) that can ensure consumers their right to safe tea.

In India pesticides are regulated by Central Insecticides Board and Registration Committee (CIBRC) and Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and the regulation has been proven to be in shambles.

“The registration of 248 pesticides by the CIBRC has no rationale, as this has been done without checking whether alternatives exist, while Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) are not set for all registered pesticides. Also, MRLs are not an indicator of safety as they are set for individual active ingredients and Greenpeace has found a cocktail of pesticides in more than half the samples tested," said Neha Saigal, Senior Campaigner, Greenpeace India.

The failure of the regulation has been further demonstrated in the tea sector with Greenpeace finding pesticides like Monocrotophos, Tebufenpyrad and Triazophos in tea samples; these pesticides are unapproved for use in tea. Greenpeace is, therefore, asking the tea companies to commit to a roadmap of gradual phase out of pesticides adopting an ecosystem based approach,” she said.

Earlier this month, two of the leading tea companies Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) and Girnar Tea came forward in support of NPM for tea after Greenpeace India released its report “Trouble Brewing”.

“The tea industry has taken cognizance of our report and acknowledged the issue of pesticides in tea. While we acknowledge the efforts made by companies like Tata Global Beverages Limited (TGBL), we hope they will adopt a new holistic approach which can lead to elimination and not reduction of pesticides. We urge the tea companies to take plantation owners and small tea growers along with them on this sustainable journey,” Saigal added further.

Recently International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements released a statement calling on the tea industry to save the tea industry and the right of consumers to safe tea.

Greenpeace said it will continue engaging with all stakeholders in the tea sector and facilitate movement towards a solution that will help the sector move out of the pesticide treadmill and ensure sustainable livelihoods for the farmers and safe tea for the consumers.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.