November 05, 2024 22:08 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Union Minister HD Kumaraswamy booked for threatening cop probing into mining case | Supreme Court upholds validity of Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Act | Not all private properties are community resources that govt can take over: Supreme Court | Pakistan's Lahore has become world's most polluted city with an AQI of 1900 on Sunday | Indian Army 'successfully completes' patrolling to a key point in Ladakh's Depsang region
Uttar Pradesh Govt refuses permission to prosecute Yogi Adityanath in 2007 riots case

Uttar Pradesh Govt refuses permission to prosecute Yogi Adityanath in 2007 riots case

| | 11 May 2017, 04:16 pm
Lucknow, May 11 (IBNS) : The Uttar Pradesh Government on Thursday refused to give permission to prosecute Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in connection with the 2007 communal riots in Gorakhpur, reports said.

Advocate general Raghvendra Singh informed the Allahabad high court that the principal secretary (home) had declined to grant sanction for prosecution of the accused.

The Chief Minister,  who was an MP from Gorakhpur when the riots took place, is one of the accused.

The Advocate General  said the decision has been taken on the basis of the opinion of the forensic report of a CD allegedly having hate speech by few of the accused.

A division bench of justices Ramesh Sinha and Umesh Chandra Srivastava had directed UP Chief Secretary  to appear in person and file a personal affidavit, besides producing all documents relating to the riots, and the sanction given by state Ggovernment to prosecute the accused.

In 2008, an FIR was lodged by Parvez Parwaz at Cantonment police station in Gorakhpur in which he accused local MP Yogi Adityanath, the then city mayor Anju Chaudhri, the then MLA Radha Mohan Agarwal and one more person of inciting communal violence.


The petitioner’s counsel sought time to file an amendment application seeking the court’s permission to change the petition to challenge the refusal of sanction for prosecution of the accused.

The bench comprising justice Ramesh Sinha and justice UC Srivastava granted 10 days’ time to the petitioner’s counsel to file an amendment application in the case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.