April 25, 2024 09:22 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre moves Supreme Court seeking modification of 2012 verdict in 2G spectrum case | 'Robert Vadra Ab Ki Baar' posters in Amethi as suspense looms over Congress candidate | Sam Pitroda's comment on wealth distribution stirs row, Congress distances itself, Amit Shah says 'party exposed' | Renowned dancer and ex-professor at Chennai academy arrested on sexual harassment charges | 'Has anyone robbed your mangalsutra during Congress rule?' Priyanka Gandhi counters PM's charge

Army tribunal finds VK Singh guilty of violating rules

India Blooms News Service | | 06 Sep 2014, 11:13 am
New Delhi, Sep 6 (IBNS): The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) said former Army chief and now a minister in the Narendra Modi-led Union cabinet General (retired) VK Singh violated rules, influenced a military court and harassed senior officers for "vengeance," reports said.

It quashed the court martial of former 33 Corps Commander Lt Gen PK Rath and ordered the Army to pay him Rs. 1 lakh for "undue harassment and loss of reputation."

Earlier, a court martial found Gen Rath guilty of issuing a no-objection certificate (NoC) to a private construction firm to set up an educational institution on a 70-acre plot adjacent to the military cantonment at Sukna forest area in West Bengal in 2011.

Sources said he had taken this forward after then military secretary Lt Gen Avdesh Prakash, during an official visit, noted the requirement for a good educational institute next to the 33 Corps headquarters.

Gen Prakash was also court-martialled months after Gen Rath was in connection with the Sukna land issue.

However, the tribunal on Friday observed that the NoC violated no rules as the land did not belong to the Army.

According to media reports, in his petition to the tribunal Gen Rath alleged that Gen VK Singh gave “undue importance” to the case as he had a "serious grudge" against Gen Prakash. Gen Prakash had made Singh commit to accepting 1950, and not 1951, as his date of birth. It later cut short Singh's tenure as Army Chief by eight months. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.