April 24, 2024 07:40 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Renowned dancer and ex-professor at Chennai academy arrested on sexual harassment charges | 'Has anyone robbed your mangalsutra during Congress rule?' Priyanka Gandhi counters PM's charge | 'Can explain manifesto to PM Modi': Mallikarjun Kharge on Muslim League remark | 'They want to break country': PM Modi's jibe over Goa Congress leader's constitution remarks | Under construction Telangana bridge collapses as high wind gushes through the area
Maha elections: BJP 'unhappy' with Shiv Sena's seat-sharing offer

Maha elections: BJP 'unhappy' with Shiv Sena's seat-sharing offer

India Blooms News Service | | 21 Sep 2014, 02:59 pm
New Delhi, Sept 21 (IBNS): Hours after Shiv Sena's "final" proposal to the Bharatiya Janata Party to save the 'Mahayuti' alliance ahead of the Maharashtra Assembly polls, the BJP said it is not happy with the new seat-sharing offer and that the decision on the same will be taken at the party's poll panel meet on Sunday evening.
"We don't want to make any offer through TV channels. We will meet in the evening and decide," BJP leader Vinod Tawde said at press conference on Sunday.
 
Stating that the BJP is not happy with the new proposal of it 25-year-old ally, party leader Eknath Khadse said, "In order to save the alliance, BJP had to surrender maximum times. Shiv Sena did not compromise on the seats that they gave us. We just want the seats that they never win."
 
However, the BJP said that it wants the 'Mahayuti' alliance to continue.
 
This comes after Uddhav Thackeray's party proposed a "final" seat-sharing formula to the Bharatiya Janata Party on Sunday eyeing the upcoming Maharashtra Assembly polls. 
 
According to reports, the Shiv Sena said it would contest from 151 seats, four seats less of its earlier demand of 155. 
 
Under the new proposal, the smaller parties in the alliance will contest from 18 seats, while the BJP will contest 119 seats, which is the same number of seats it had contested in the 2009 state elections.
 
Meanwhile, Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray said, "There is a tug of war in the alliance. What is happening right before elections is unfortunate. Seat distribution is a complicated affair."
 
Addressing a gathering on Sunday, Uddhav said the party needs more power to serve the people.
 
The Sena earlier wanted to contest from 155 of the 288 seats in the assembly and suggested that the BJP contest from 125 seats.
 
However, the BJP on Saturday rejected Shiv Sena's offer on seat sharing for the upcoming Maharashtra elections.
 
Speaking to media, Maharashtra BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis said: "I met Uddhav Thackeray. I told him that we received the  proposal... I informed that we cannot accept the proposal."
 
He said if the proposal is being considered then the party will need to contest  lesser seats than the last election
 
Taking the verbal battle a level higher, Shiv Sena on Friday reacted strongly to its coalition partner for 25 years.
 
“In Maharashtra, the Shiv Sena is a party that gives, not a party that takes. We are not asking. We are giving. They should think about what they are asking,” media reports quoted Sena spokesperson Sanjay Raut as saying.
 
He also said that, Shiv Sena was not going to compromise with Maharashtra’s self-respect, or the party’s self-respect.
 
“It is up to them to accept or not,” Raut added.
 
The reaction came hours after the BJP gave a 12-hour deadline to its Shiv Sena to decide on the issue of tough seat-sharing negotiation for the Maharashtra Assembly polls scheduled next month.
 
The BJP earlier said the party wants to contest a minimum of 130 of the 288 seats in the Maharashtra assembly.
 
The BJP also demanded the chief ministerial post.
 
Both of the demands are dismissed by Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray that led to a coalition impasse.
 
The ‘Mahayuti’ or grand coalition partners in NDA locked horns over seat sharing deadlock going on for weeks.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.