November 03, 2024 01:10 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Andhra Pradesh: Three-year-old girl raped and murdered by relative in Tirupati | Two terrorists killed in encounter with security forces in Kashmir's Anantnag | Bengal: 5-year-old girl raped and murdered in Alipurduar, accused beaten to death by angry villagers | Kashmir: Encounter breaks out between security forces and terrorists in Srinagar | Mumbai Police initiates extradition process to bring back Lawrence Bishnoi's brother Anmol Bishnoi from US
Judge unavailable, Supreme Court not to hear Ayodhya case on January 29

Judge unavailable, Supreme Court not to hear Ayodhya case on January 29

| @indiablooms | 27 Jan 2019, 01:59 pm

New Delhi, Jan 27 (IBNS): The Ayodhya case will not be taken up for hearing as scheduled on January 29 because one of the five judges on the constitution bench has become unavailable.

The sitting "stands cancelled" because Judge S.A. Bobde is unavailable on Tuesday, says a notification from the Supreme Court.

The notification did not mention the next hearing date.

The other judges on the bench are Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Abdul Nazeer, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Justice D.Y. Chandrachud.

The CJI had reconstituted the bench on Friday after Justice U.U. Lalit had recused himself from the five-judge bench saying he had been a lawyer in a related case.

What is the case?

The Supreme Court will hear pleas challenging Allahabad High Court's verdict which divided 2.77-acre disputed Ayodhya land among Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.

The apex court will decide whether Ram temple can be built in the same disputed land, where Babri Masjid was held till 1992.

Background of the case:

In 1992, the disputed Babri Masjid structure was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born at that land.

On September 27, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Modi wants to wait for verdict:

Though several right-wing organisations had demanded an ordinance be passed by the central government to construct Ram temple in Ayodhya, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on January 1 said he will wait for the verdict to come.

Citing the government took action over triple talaq only after the top court verdict, Modi, in an interview with ANI, said: "I urge Congress people to allow the court proceedings to take place over the Ram temple case in the Supreme court. After the verdict comes, the government will initiate its action."

How the construction of Ram temple matters to BJP?

The verdict, if passed prior to 2019 General Elections, will boost up the BJP, whose political commitment was building Ram temple in Ayodhya.

After the adjournment of the hearing, the verdict has become uncertain before the Lok Sabha polls.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.