January 03, 2025 05:04 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Punjab cop dismissed for facilitating TV interview of Larence Bishnoi while in custody | 'Not Veer Savarkar', Congress student wing demands Delhi college be named after Manmohan Singh | 'Cowardly': PM Modi condemns New Orleans terrorist attack that killed 15 | Prashant Kishor starts fast unto death over Bihar Public Service Commission prelims cancellation demand | Bangladesh court denies bail to arrested Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das | Tesla Cybertruck with fuel and fireworks explodes near Donald Trump's Las Vegas hotel, 1 killed | US: Mass shooting at a New York nightclub, 11 people shot | Truck driver who rammed into New Orleans crowd flying ISIS flag identified as US Army veteran Shamsud-Din Jabbar | SRK, Akshay Kumar praise PM Modi's global initiative to take Indian cinema to a greater scale | Manipur CM N Biren Singh responds after Congress leader asks him 'why can't PM' visit' violence-hit northeastern state
Image Credit: IBNS File

MP, MLA disqualification: Role of Speaker slammed by Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jan 21, 2020, at 08:08 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Parliament may seriously consider amending the Constitution to substitute the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or Legislative Assemblies as the arbiter of disputes concerning disqualification which arise under the Tenth Schedule.

It asked Parliament to rethink, if Speaker, who is also affiliated to a party, should decide disqualification petitions of Members of Parliament or Legislative Assemblies.

A bench, headed by Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, ruled that a permanent body with a proper mechanism should be set up to adjudge the cases of disqualification of lawmakers.

The apex court held that Parliament should think over having an independent and permanent body to decide disqualification petitions against MPs and MLAs, instead of the Speaker retaining exclusive powers.

The verdict came on a petition filed by one K Meghachandra Singh.

It is time, the Supreme Court ruled, that Parliament have a rethink on whether disqualification petitions ought to be entrusted to the quasi-judicial authority of Speaker who continues to belong to a particular political party either de jure or de facto.

Image Credit: IBNS File

 

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.