Rajdeep Sardesai No contempt of court proceedings against Rajdeep Sardesai: SC clarifies
New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday night clarified that it has not initiated any contempt of court proceedings against journalist and TV anchor Rajdeep Sardesai for his August 2020 tweets.
The apex court said that the status shown on its website was an error placed "inadvertently".
In its clarification statement, the top court said, “No such proceeding has been initiated against Mr Rajdeep Sardesai. Status shown at Supreme Court website…has been placed inadvertently and appropriate action to rectify the same is under process.”
Supreme Court clarifies: “no such proceeding has been initiated against Mr Rajdeep Sardesai”. Adds “status shown at Supreme Court website...has been placed inadvertently” & “appropriate action to rectify the same is under process”. @IndianExpress https://t.co/Zdzj3XE57w
— Ananthakrishnan G (@axidentaljourno) February 16, 2021
The clarification comes hours after the apex court's website showed that it had registered a suo motu contempt case against Sardesai for his tweets allegedly criticising the judiciary.
The case was registered by the Supreme Court based on a petition by one Aastha Khurana, media reports said.
The developments come five months after Attorney General KK Venugopal had turned down the request to initiate any criminal proceeding against the popular TV anchor on basis of the same complaint.
In his complaint, the petitioner has referred to two tweets made by Sardesai in July and August 2020.
While one of the tweets was in connection with the contempt case on lawyer Prashant Bhushan in which he was fined Re 1, the other tweet was about former Supreme Court Justice Arun Mishra.
"Breaking: Rs 1 token fine imposed by SC on @pbhushan1 in contempt case.. if he doesn’t pay it, then 3 months jail sentence! Clearly, court looking to wriggle out of an embarrassment of its own making," Sardesai had said in one of his tweets.
Breaking: Rs 1 token fine imposed by SC on @pbhushan1 in contempt case.. if he doesn’t pay it, then 3 months jail sentence! Clearly, court looking to wriggle out of an embarrassment of its own making.
— Rajdeep Sardesai (@sardesairajdeep) August 31, 2020
More on @pbhushan1 case: FYI: Sec 67 of IPC stipulates - if fine < Rs. 50/- ,imprisonment can’t exceed 2 months. SC has given 3 months.
— Rajdeep Sardesai (@sardesairajdeep) August 31, 2020
2. SC has no authority to debar practice - 5 Judge Bench ruling of SC in VC Misra’s case. Why can’t SC just apologise and be done with it!đ
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.
Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
