November 22, 2024 20:57 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Chhattisgarh: 10 Maoists killed during encounter with security forces in Sukma | Baba Siddique murder case: Arrested Akashdeep Gill used a labourer's hotspot to evade tracking, say police | Donald Trump picks 'smart and tough' Pam Bondi as new US Attorney General after Matt Gaetz withdraws | Canadian government denies media report that claims PM Modi knew of Khalistani leader Nijjar's killing | PM Modi bestowed Dominica's highest award at India-CARICOM Summit
'Harsh but can’t be expunged’: SC quashes EC's plea against critical remarks of Madras HC
Election Commission

'Harsh but can’t be expunged’: SC quashes EC's plea against critical remarks of Madras HC

| @indiablooms | 06 May 2021, 04:21 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to expunge critical remarks of the Madras High Court holding the Election Commission responsible for the surge in COVID-19 cases in the country.

A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud also noted that the High court’s observations against the poll panel were harsh and at times off the cuff remarks are susceptible to misinterpretation.

However, the bench, also comprising Justice MR Shah, dismissed the plea by EC to restrain the media from reporting oral remarks made by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court, saying it will be a retrograde act and people deserve to know what is happening inside the Court.

With the advent of technology, there are real-time updates from a courtroom as a part of freedom of speech and expression of the press, the bench said.

On April 26, the Madras High Court had come down heavily on EC for not banning political rallies and 'singularly' blamed the poll panel for the second wave of COVID-19 in the county.

"Election Commission officers should probably be booked on murder charges," the bench had said in an oral observation.

In its order today, the top court said, the Madras HC's observations against the EC do not form part of the judicial order, hence no question of expunging them.

Justice Chandrachud said the case posed a delicate balancing of powers between the High Court and the EC, which were both constitutional authorities.

The top court also lauded high courts for commendable work done by them in effectively supervising the COVID-19 pandemic management.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.