November 22, 2024 11:06 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
PM Modi bestowed Dominica's highest award at India-CARICOM Summit | 69-year-old Delhi man, a St. Stephen's alumnus, arrested for conning govt officers by posing as ex-IPS | 'Baseless': Adani Group denies US charges of bribery and fraud against Gautam Adani | AAP's first list of candidates for Delhi polls feature six turncoats | PM Modi is incapable to arrest Gautam Adani: Rahul Gandhi after tycoon charged with bribery and fraud in the US
'Pursue farmers against stubble burning, don't want to punish them': SC tells govt
Stubble burning

'Pursue farmers against stubble burning, don't want to punish them': SC tells govt

| @indiablooms | 17 Nov 2021, 05:31 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court Wednesday asked the government to persuade farmers against stubble burning as it does not want to punish them Delhi and its neighbouring cities continue to reel under air quality crisis, media reports said.

"We do not want to penalise the farmers. We have already asked the Centre to pursue and request those farmers to not burn stubble at least for a week," Chief Justice NV Ramana said today, reported NDTV.

"Debates on TV are causing more pollution than any other sources. Everyone has their own agenda there. We are trying to work out a solution here," the Chief Justice said pulling up the officials for indulging in blame game on the issue, the report added.

"Irrespective of figures in affidavits, we have to consider the plight of the farmers...what compels him to burn the stubble? Nobody is concerned about that. People sleeping in five-star hotels in Delhi blame farmers. Look at such small landholdings. Can they afford the machines you all talk about?" said Justice Surya Kant, who had earlier insisted on providing incentives to find alternative, the report said.

The apex court's remarks came as the Centre and the Delhi government blamed each other over air pollution in Delhi.

The Centre told SC that fires have only 10 percent share in the national capital's severe pollution.

As the hearing began, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the court, "We heard some nasty utterances on TV about me that I misled the court by saying stubble burning is only contributing 4-7 percent. We had said in our affidavit that some factors like stubble burning contribute more after October to pollution. It's not throughout the year."

In response, Chief Justice NV Ramana said, "These figures are not important for us. Unless the parties in the case are trying to divert the issue. We are concerned with lowering pollution. When you hold a public office, you are bound to get such criticism. When conscience is clear there is no issue. Forget it."

"Forget the politics... it is our duty to tell you that stubble burning is a cause. It varies from 0 to 58 percent, based on the month we are talking about. The Solicitor General may have taken a four-month or six-month average," Delhi government's lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi stressed.

But Chief Justice Ramana delivered a sharp reprimand, "If you keep raising these other things like that then the main issue will not get resolved."

Petitioner's lawyer Vikas Singh told the court said, "Air pollution is an endemic problem. The Supreme Court asks the government, and the governments say 'we will do this and that'... but nothing happens. It's wrongly reported that stubble contributes only 10 percent to air pollution. It could be up to 50 percent during the current season. We are not into farmer bashing. But stubble burning is a serious problem."

Expressing disappointment, the Chief Justice said, "The government of India, over a period of time, I have observed that the bureaucracy has developed inertia. They want everything to be done by the court - water sprinkling, stopping fires... It's unfortunate on the part of the Executive.

"Two hours of our time was wasted. We had already asked you to take a call after joint meetings."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.