November 05, 2024 19:04 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Union Minister HD Kumaraswamy booked for threatening cop probing into mining case | Supreme Court upholds validity of Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Act | Not all private properties are community resources that govt can take over: Supreme Court | Pakistan's Lahore has become world's most polluted city with an AQI of 1900 on Sunday | Indian Army 'successfully completes' patrolling to a key point in Ladakh's Depsang region
BJP moves to regain tribals' support in Tripura using royal scion Pradyot Debbarman ahead of 2024 polls
Tripura politics
Image: UNI

BJP moves to regain tribals' support in Tripura using royal scion Pradyot Debbarman ahead of 2024 polls

| @indiablooms | 15 May 2023, 08:40 pm

Agartala/IBNS/UNI: With the victory of Congress in Karnataka, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Tripura has intensified its effort to strengthen the party base in tribal-dominated areas to win both Lok Sabha seats of the state in the coming general elections.

Tribal votes in Tripura are considered to be the determinant of victory in any election, as it has 20 reserved seats in the assembly and one seat in Lok Sabha while they have significant presences in another 22 assembly constituencies and in the unreserved Loksabha seat.

Earlier, CPI(M) had a solid base in the tribal areas but it was eroded by IPFT and later by royal scion’s Pradyot Kishore Debbarman’s party TIPRA Motha.

Allegedly, in the just concluded assembly election, the BJP used Motha in 22 unreserved tribal seats and funded Pradyot to put candidates that divided the non-BJP tribal votes and ensured the defeat of the Congress-CPI(M) combined in those seats.

As a result, BJP narrowly secured the victory with 33 seats in the 60-member assembly, and TIPRA Motha became the main opposition in the assembly with 13 MLAs.

However, to keep them separated from the Congress and CPI(M), the BJP has allegedly been offered ministerial berths and several other administrative posts to Motha MLAs on the one hand, on the other, home minister Amit Shah and Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma engaged in dialogue with Pradyot’s demand of constitutional solution of tribals without specifying the details.

Based on Shah’s meeting Pradyot was campaigning for two months the central government has agreed to appoint an interlocuter to look at the demand of Greater Tipraland.

Pradyot himself had announced the name of former IPS officer and the mediator of the Naga peace talks A K Mishra as interlocuter for Tripura as well as his schedule for visiting the state although Chief Minister Dr Manik Saha denied such a decision.

Pradyot Kishore Debbarman faced serious embarrassment after failing to ensure the appointment of an interlocutor till now while the opposition questioned the validity of the interlocutor’s engagement. The leaders and workers of TIPRA became unhappy with Pradyot believing that he fell into the trap of BJP marginalizing Motha in the hills and regaining BJP’s support base.

“Pradyot Kishore now becomes a puppet in the hands of BJP; he cannot get out of this. He might have forgotten the modalities committee constituted by MHA in 2018 in response to Tipraland demand of its ally IPFT, which yield nothing in five years and now it is erased. The so-called interlocutor is nothing but a big bluff to innocent tribal and cheats their sentiment,” alleged CPI(M) State Secretary Jitendra Chaudhury.

TIPRA Motha is in power at the ADC and had been accorded the status of the principal opposition in the assembly. “If the government is keen to resolve issues of the indigenous people, the talks may take place across the table. TIPRA Motha, after all, is not an outlawed outfit”, Choudhury observed and added that usually interlocutors are appointed to invite banned outfits to the table of talk.

“When our state had seen the rise of insurgent groups like TNV, NLFT, and ATTF at different points in time, the Indian government appointed interlocutors for holding talks. Although all these back-channel talks occurred unofficially. Now who are the proponents of the appointment of interlocutors is unknown to me but if it happens, it will undermine the constitution of India”, he pointed out.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.