November 22, 2024 23:25 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre to send over 10,000 additional soldiers to violence-hit Manipur amid fresh violence | Chhattisgarh: 10 Maoists killed during encounter with security forces in Sukma | Baba Siddique murder case: Arrested Akashdeep Gill used a labourer's hotspot to evade tracking, say police | Donald Trump picks 'smart and tough' Pam Bondi as new US Attorney General after Matt Gaetz withdraws | Canadian government denies media report that claims PM Modi knew of Khalistani leader Nijjar's killing
Supreme Court stays proceedings pending in various HCs against 'Adipurush'
Adipurush row
Image credit: Instagram/ Kriti Sanon

Supreme Court stays proceedings pending in various HCs against 'Adipurush'

| @indiablooms | 22 Jul 2023, 01:00 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: The Supreme Court Friday stayed the proceedings pending in various High Courts against Hindi film Adipurush and dismissed a PIL filed by a practicing lawyer, seeking revocation of CBFC certification of the movie for allegedly hurting religious sentiments.

A bench of the top court, headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, passed the order, after hearing a plea seeking revocation of the CBFC (Central Board of Film Certification) certificate for the Hindi film, Adipurush.

It stayed the proceedings in multiple High Courts against Adipurush movie makers.

The Allahabad High Court had earlier last week asked the producer, director and dialogue writer of the movie to personally appear before it.

The apex court also cautioned courts against sitting in appeal over censor board certification in such matters.

Harish Salve, senior lawyer and former Solicitor General (SG) appearing for the film's producer, told the Supreme Court that countless people are going before various high courts seeking different prayers.

While refusing to entertain the Public Interest Litigation, the Supreme Court in its order said, "These are not matters for this court to hear and sit in appeal of certification. If anyone is aggrieved by a decision of appellate authority they can pursue remedies under law."

The apex court also noted in its order that the PIL has been filed under Article 32 by a practicing advocate seeking revocation of certification to feature film Adipurush for hurting religious sentiments, distorting texts and facts.

There are also countless people approaching different High Courts.

"We may hold here that cinematographic depictions play with the original material, to what extent it is permissible a body is there. It is not possible for this court to interfere for each person's sensibilities under Article 32," the top court said in its order.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.