November 23, 2024 07:03 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Third World War has begun:' Ex-Ukraine military commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny | UK-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations to resume in early 2024 | UK can arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if he visits country based on ICC warrant | Centre to send over 10,000 additional soldiers to violence-hit Manipur amid fresh violence | Chhattisgarh: 10 Maoists killed during encounter with security forces in Sukma
Delhi High Court orders Tarun Tejpal, Tehelka to pay Rs 2 cr to army officer in defamation case
Image Credit: UNI

Delhi High Court orders Tarun Tejpal, Tehelka to pay Rs 2 cr to army officer in defamation case

| @indiablooms | 22 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has granted Rs 2 crore to an Indian Army officer as compensation for the damage to his reputation caused by a 2001 "expose" carried out by a news portal, which accused him of involvement in corruption related to defence procurement, media reports said.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, who heard Major General M S Ahluwalia's case, ordered Tehelka.Com, its owner M/s Buffalo Communications, its proprietor Tarun Tejpal, and two reporters, Aniruddha Bahal and Mathew Samuel, to make the payment.

The judge emphasized that this was a clear and severe case of defaming an honest Army officer, and an apology made 23 years after the publication was "not only insufficient but meaningless".

However, the court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish any defamation committed by Zee Telefilm Ltd and its officials when broadcasting the story as per their arrangement with the news portal.

The court further noted that the plaintiff not only suffered a decline in public estimation but also endured severe damage to his character due to serious corruption allegations, which cannot be rectified or healed by any subsequent refutation.

On March 13, 2001, the news portal published a story titled "Operation West End," which alleged corruption in defence deals related to the import of new defence equipment.

The plaintiff, represented by lawyer Chetan Anand, contended that he was defamed in the said story, as it falsely broadcast and reported that he had accepted a bribe.

In its 48-page judgment, the court dismissed the defence of "truth," "public good," and "good faith" raised by the defendants.

It emphasised that there could not be a more damaging defamation to a person of integrity than falsely imputing that he had demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs 50,000.

The court further highlighted that as a consequence of such reporting, a Court of Inquiry was initiated against the plaintiff. Although no misconduct was proven, the plaintiff faced "serious displeasure."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.