December 26, 2024 04:20 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Anna University sexual assault case: Accused is a DMK worker, claims BJP's Annamalai | Celebrities too responsible for crowd control: Telangana CM Revanth Reddy to Telugu filmdom amid Pushpa 2 stampede row | Boat capsizes off Calangute Beach in Goa; 1 killed, 20 rescued | Canada announces change to immigration system, likely to impact Indians seeking permanent residence | Azerbaijan Airlines tragedy: 32 passengers rescued, flight attempted several emergency landing before crashing | Man sets himself on fire near Parliament building; locals, police rush him to hospital | Azerbaijan Airlines passenger plane enroute to Russia with over 70 people onboard crashes in Kazakhstan | Atishi will be arrested in fake case, claims Arvind Kejriwal after Delhi govt disowns health and women's schemes | Delhi govt departments disown Arvind Kejriwal's major poll promises, AAP chief reacts | 'Our nation will always be grateful to him': PM Modi writes article in tribute to Atal Bihari Vajpayee on his birth centenary
TN Minister
Photo courtesy: Facebook/V Sethilbalaji

Madras HC leaves it to SC to decide on ED questioning of arrested Tamil Nadu minister in money laundering case

| @indiablooms | Jul 26, 2023, at 01:33 am

Chennai/IBNS/UNI: The Madras High Court on Tuesday left it to the Supreme Court to decide on when the Enforcement Directorate (ED) could question Tamil Nadu Minister V.Senthilabalaji, who was arrested in a money laundering case and now in judicial custody and closed the Habeas Corpus Petition (HCP) filed by his wife.

When the plea was listed before the Division Bench comprising Justices Ms J Nisha Banu and D Bharatha Chakravarthy they closed the HCP as the apex court seized the matter.

The bench closed the HCP filed by the minister's wife Megala, after hearing the submissions of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the ED, and senior counsel NR Elango, who represented Senthilbalaji.

After a split verdict by the same bench, with Justice Banu allowing the plea filed by Megala and wanting the Minister to be set at liberty, Justice Bharatha Chakravarthy dismissed it and said the ED arrested Senthilbalaji as per law and that the probe agency could question.

Following this, the HCP was listed before third judge C.V.Karthikeyan who concurred with the views of Justice Bharatha Chakravarthy and said the HCP could be referred to the Chief Justice to be listed before the Division Bench to decide from which date the ED could take the Minister, who had undergone a bypass surgery after his arrest on June 14, under custody for interrogation and that the period of treatment undergone by the Minister, now without portfolio, in a private hospital could be excluded from the period of custody.

When the case was taken up for hearing through video-conferencing on Tuesday, Justice Nisha Banu said "I stand by my judgment dated July 4, 2023. I have nothing to say further in this matter."

When  Tushar Mehta said the matter was referred to this Division Bench only to decide the date from which the ED's custody would begin, Banu reiterated that she had nothing to say.

"Since the Supreme Court is seized of the matter, we will close the case," she said.

In his submissions, Elango said the petitioner had challenged the orders and that the Special Leave Petition (SLP) is pending before the apex court.

Stating that the ED has also challenged a portion of the judgment, he said both the SLPs are coming up for a hearing on Wednesday. As both parties have challenged the orders, the Madra HC wants to wait till the Supreme Court gives its orders.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.