December 27, 2024 07:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
I have lost a mentor and guide: Rahul Gandhi writes on Manmohan Singh's demise | Manmohan Singh left strong imprint on our economic policy over years: PM Modi | A rare leader who spoke softly but achieved monumental strides: Gautam Adani mourns Manmohan Singh's death | Instagram influencer and freelance RJ Simran Singh dies by suicide in Gurugram | Anna University sexual assault case: Accused is a DMK worker, claims BJP's Annamalai | Celebrities too responsible for crowd control: Telangana CM Revanth Reddy to Telugu filmdom amid Pushpa 2 stampede row | Boat capsizes off Calangute Beach in Goa; 1 killed, 20 rescued | Canada announces change to immigration system, likely to impact Indians seeking permanent residence | Azerbaijan Airlines tragedy: 32 passengers rescued, flight attempted several emergency landing before crashing | Man sets himself on fire near Parliament building; locals, police rush him to hospital
Tandav row
Image Credit: Amazon Prime Twitter Handle

Allahabad HC rejects protection to Amazon top executive from arrest in 'Tanadav' row

| @indiablooms | Feb 26, 2021, at 03:13 am

Lucknow/IBNS: A single-judge bench of Allahabad High Court has rejected an anticipatory bail plea filed by Amazon Prime India's top executive Aparna Purohit over an  FIR filed by Uttar Pradesh Police in Noida against the makers of the controversial web series 'Tandav'.

Purohit has been accused of promoting religious enmity and defiling a place of worship.

She has protection from arrest in a second, separate case filed by the police in Lucknow. Another judge in the Allahabad High Court has extended that protection till March 9 three days ago.

Rejecting Purohit's anticipatory bail in the Noida case, Justice Siddharth said, "The conduct of the applicant shows that she has scant respect for the law of the land and her conduct further disentitles her to any relief from this court."

Justice Siddharth said, "The fact remains that the applicant had not been vigilant and has acted irresponsibly making her open to criminal prosecution in permitting streaming of a movie which is against the fundamental rights of the majority of citizens of this country and therefore, her fundamental right of life and liberty cannot be protected by grant of anticipatory bail to her in the exercise of discretionary powers of this court."

The court also observed that there is a "growing tendency" in the Hindi film industry to subvert the image of historical and mythological personalities.

"If not curbed in time, it may have disastrous consequences for the Indian social, religious and communal order. There appears to be a design behind such acts on the part of people who just give a disclaimer in all the films and depict things in movies which are really religiously, socially and communally offensive in nature."

Earlier, the Supreme Court last month refused to provide protection against arrest to the team of 'Tandav' after at least three FIRs were filed in Uttar Pradesh over the content which allegedly insults the Hindu gods and goddesses.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.