March 05, 2025 01:57 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
9 civilians die as suicide bombers crash 2 explosive-laden cars into Pakistani army compound | Hyderabad techie dies by suicide after 6 months of wedding, family alleges dowry harrasment by husband | India defeat Australia by 4 wickets to book a spot in Champions Trophy finals | Maharashtra minister resigns amid outrage over sarpanch's brutal murder in Beed | Haryana Congress worker murder: Video emerges showing accused dragging suitcase with Himani Narwal's body inside it | Supreme Court slams 'oversmart' Samay Raina for making fun of proceedings in Canada, asks him to 'behave' | Indian woman facing death row in UAE for killing a child has been executed: Foreign ministry tells court | Crucial to have Trump’s support, says Zelenskyy a day after fiery White House exchange | 'We're looking for peace, Zelenskyy wants Russia-Ukraine war to continue': Donald Trump after White House public spat | Volodymyr Zelenskyy refuses to apologise to Donald Trump after public spat over Russia-Ukraine war

Gauhati High Court says Electoral Photo Identity Card is not a proof of citizenship

| @indiablooms | Feb 17, 2020, at 11:41 pm

Guwahati/IBNS: Amid strong debate over citizenship across the county along with protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act or CAA, National Population Register (NPR), National Register of Citizens (NRC), the Gauhati High Court has said that an Electoral Photo Identity Card is not a conclusive proof of Indian citizenship.

The division bench of Gauhati High Court comprising of Justice Manojit Bhuyan and Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia has recently given the judgement while hearing a writ petition filed by one Md. Babul Islam from Margherita in Assam’s Tinsukia district.

Md. Babul Islam filed a writ petition against an order of the Foreigners Tribunal, where he was declared as a foreigner of the post-1971 stream.

The court delivered the judgment by referring to a previous order.

“…the Supreme Court has reiterated the legal position that marking of documents as exhibits and their proof are two different legal concepts. Mere production and marking of a document as exhibits cannot be held to be due proof of its contents. Its execution has to be proved by admissible evidence i.e., by the evidence of those persons who can vouch safe for the truth of the facts in issue. Regarding Electoral Photo Identity Card this court in the case of Md. Babul Islam Vs. State of Assam [WP(C) No. 3547 of 2016] has held that Electoral Photo Identity Card is not a proof of citizenship. The petitioner herein has failed to file voter lists prior to 1997, thereby the petitioner failed to prove that he has been staying in Assam prior to 25.03.1971,” the judgment said.

Clause 5 of the Assam Accord deals with the foreigners classified under three heads for identification and differential treatment.

According to the Assam Accord, all persons who came to Assam prior to January 1, 1966, including those whose names appear on the electoral rolls used in 1967 elections, shall be regularized.

On the other hand, the foreigners who came to Assam after January 1, 1966 (inclusive) and upto March 24, 1971 shall be detected in accordance with the provisions of the Foreigners Act, 1946 and the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order 1964 and would be disenfranchised for 10 years that they will get voting rights only after expiry of 10 years from the date of their detection or declaration as foreigner.

Those came into Assam on or after March 25, 1971, shall continue to be detected, deleted and deported.

Senior advocate of Gauhati High Court Bijan Mahajan said that the Gauhati High Court has against delivered a judgment that, Electoral Photo Identity Card is not proof of Indian citizenship.

(By Hemanta Kumar Nath, Guwahati)


 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.