May 04, 2025 01:23 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pahalgam fallout: India suspends Pakistan I&B minister Ataullah Tarar's X account | India bans all imports from Pakistan in Pahalgam terror attack fallout | Yunus aide threatens Bangladesh would occupy North East states if India attacks Pakistan | Pahalgam aftermath: Pakistan test-fires ballistic missile with 450-km range amid escalation in tension with India | 'Your govt stands at a historic crossroads': Tejashwi Yadav to PM Modi on caste census move | Pahalgam attack: Supreme Court stays deportation of PoK-born man, his family with Indian passports | Cops charge OTT show's host Ajaz Khan, producer Rajkymar Pandey over 'sex positions' viral clip | 7.4 magnitude earthquake strikes off coast of Chile and Argentina, tsunami warning issued | PM Modi inaugurates Vizhinjam International Seaport in Kerala worth Rs. 8,800 crore | 'Many will get their sleep disturbed': Modi's veiled jibe at Congress over Shashi Tharoor, Pinarayi Vijayan's presence at Kerala event
CEC Appointment
Rahul Gandhi with a copy of the Constitution of India (Photo courtesy: Rahul Gandhi X handle)

Modi govt exacerbated voters' concerns over integrity of electoral process: Rahul Gandhi slams new CEC appointment

| @indiablooms | Feb 18, 2025, at 03:14 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: Leader of Opposition and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi has slammed the appointment of Gyanesh Kumar as the new Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) claiming the Modi government violated the Supreme Court order and removed the Chief Justice of India as a part of the selection committee.

In a long X post, Rahul wrote, "During the meeting of the committee to select the next Election Commissioner, I presented a dissent note to the PM and HM, that stated: The most fundamental aspect of an independent Election Commission free from executive interference is the process of choosing the Election Commissioner and Chief Election Commissioner.

"By violating the Supreme Court order and removing the Chief Justice of India from the committee, the Modi Government has exacerbated the concerns of hundreds of millions of voters over the integrity of our electoral process."

He added, "As the LoP it is my duty to uphold the ideals of Babasaheb Ambedkar and the founding leaders of our nation and hold the government to account.

"It is both disrespectful and discourteous for the PM and HM to have made a midnight decision to select the new CEC, when the very composition of the committee and the process is being challenged in the Supreme Court and is due to be heard in less than forty-eight hours."

Gyanesh Kumar, who replaced Rajiv Kumar, is the first CEC to be appointed under the new law. He will oversee the conduct of the Bihar Assembly election later this year and the polls in West Bengal, Assam, and Tamil Nadu next year.

Kumar, a 1988-batch IAS officer from Kerala cadre, is the senior of the two commissioners on the three-member panel.

The appointment came shortly after a meeting of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi this evening to pick a successor to Rajiv Kumar who retires on Tuesday.

Even as the Congress party objected to the selection of a CEC stating that the law for appointment to the post was challenged in the Supreme Court, the Centre went ahead with the same.

The top court is expected to hear the matter on February 22.

"When the Supreme Court indicated that it would be hearing the matter on the 22nd, we wanted the meeting to be postponed. The legal team of the Congress has also endorsed the decision," the Congress had said.

Traditionally, the President of India appoints the Chief Election Commissioner on the advice of the Prime Minister. The appointee has to be the senior most of the two remaining election commissioners.

Gayanesh Kumar has been appointed under a new law  - Chief Election Commissioner And Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service And Term of Office) Act, 2023.

Under this, a committee headed by the law minister shortlisted five candidates, and the selection team comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and a cabinet minister took the final call.

This law, however, has been challenged in the Supreme Court. The point of contention is that including a cabinet minister instead of the Chief Justice, as was expected, violates the panel's neutrality.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu