December 23, 2024 06:52 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Cylinder blast at a temple in Karnataka's Hubbali injures nine people | Kuwait PM personally sees off Modi at airport as Indian premier concludes two-day trip | Three pro-Khalistani terrorists, who attacked a police outpost in Gurdaspur, killed in an encounter | Who is Sriram Krishnan, an Indian-American picked by Donald Trump as US AI policy advisor? | Mohali building collapse: Death toll rises to 2, many feared trapped for 17 hours | 4-year-old killed after speeding car driven by a teen hits him in Mumbai | PM Modi attends opening ceremony of Arabian Gulf Cup in Kuwait | Jaipur gas tanker crash: Toll touches 14, 30 critical | Arrest warrant against former cricketer Robin Uthappa over 'PF fraud' | PM Modi emplanes for a visit to Kuwait
Mukul Rohtagi
Image credit: UNI

No recovery, no consumption and no medical test done: says Rohatgi appearing for Aryan Khan

| @indiablooms | Oct 26, 2021, at 11:14 pm

Mumbai/UNI: Former Advocate General Mukul Rohatgi appearing for Aryan Khan in a bail hearing in the Bombay High Court in the cruise drugs bust case on Tuesday highlighted there was no recovery, no consumption or no medical test done as far as Aryan Khan is concerned.

Since there is no recovery or consumption, my client was wrongly arrested, Rohatgi said as he narrated to the court how the bail application traveled to the High Court.

He also said: "What is put against me is that since I came with Arbaaz and apparently had knowledge of the contraband with him, I have conscious possession.

"Conscious possession is what is under my control and knowledge. If I am driving the car and something is in the car, there could be conscious possession.

"My case is that there is no conscious possession at all. What somebody else had in their shoe is not my concern. That cannot be my "conscious possess".

Rohatgi pointed out to the court a last year's Supreme Court judgment in "Tofan Singh" case which held that NDPS officers are police officers and confessions given to them cannot be admitted.

He also cited judgment and said "In an old case involving a minister he was booked for harbouring a terrorist as a servant brought him into the house. The apex court said that cannot be a case.

Rohatgi said: "No case is made out by NCB either of consumption or of sale or purchase of drugs by Aryan."

He said that Aryan has not accused any Narcotics Control Bureau officials and he is not connected or concerned with any "panch or witness" referring to independent witness KP Gosavi and his bodyguard Parbhakar Sali, who are involved in the alleged transaction of big money to NCB zonal officer Sameer Wankhede.

"The Director of NCB on Monday said the affidavit was a result of some political leader. But today the unsavoury controversy is rebounding on me, they are putting it on me," Rohatgi told the court on behalf of Aryan.

"I don't want to sully my case by siding with either the political personality or the panchas. Because I am not connected to anyone," Rohatgi said.

Rohatgi said that the WhatsApp chats that NCB earlier mentioned against Aryan "are nothing to do with cruise party ...the chats with the people were before the party. And the same cannot be used" against the star kid now.

Rohatgi said: "Aryan Khan had gone there with Arbaaz. That's all. They are some boys..the law provides that for small quantities the maximum punishment is one year year and minimum is nothing."

He also read out Section 20b (ii) of NDPS Act to say that the legislative intent is clear. Maximum is 1 year and minimum is nothing. Rohatgi also said that Aryan have not financed anyone for drug trafficking.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.