December 16, 2024 15:48 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh likely to hold national polls in late 2025 or early 2026, says Yunus in Victory Day speech | Constitution stood test of time: Nirmala Sitharaman in Rajya Sabha | PM Museum requests Rahul Gandhi to return Pandit Nehru's historical letters | Indian tabla maestro Zakir Hussain dies at 73 in San Francisco, confirms family | Kolkata woman strangled, beheaded and chopped into pieces for refusing brother-in-law's advances | Arvind Kejriwal, CM Atishi to contest Delhi polls from current constituencies | Atul Subhash suicide case: Wife Nikita, her mother and brother arrested | Pushpa 2 stampede: Allu Arjun walks out of jail, actor's lawyer slams delay in release | Donald Trump intends to end 'inconvenient' and 'very costly' Daylight Saving Time | Suchir Balaji: Indian-origin former OpenAI researcher found dead at US apartment

SC puts CBI chief Ranjit Sinha on notice

| | Sep 09, 2014, at 10:38 pm
New Delhi, Sept 9 (IBNS): CBI Director Ranjit Sinha was on Tuesday granted 10 days by the Supreme Court to respond to a plea seeking his removal as head of CBI for allegedly trying to protect companies and people against whom his office is investigating on criminal charges in the 2G and Coal allocation scam.

CBI chief landed in big controversy after he has been accused by Centre or Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), an NGO associated with 2G spectrum case of meeting people who are accused in 2G and ‘Coalgate scam’.

CPIL counsel lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan has brought allegations against Sinha of abusing his office (CBI) and his powers to influence the investigation in the wrong-path as well as trying to protect the accused in the high profile coal allocation and 2G cases. 

In his petition against Sinha, Bhushan has alleged that the CBI Director has met top officials of the Reliance Telecom at least 50 times in 15 months at his 2, Janpath residence residence in Delhi.

Citing media reports which allegedly leaked the entries of the visitor’s diary at Sinha’s residence, Bhushan told the apex court that entry register at Sinha’s residence is "very disturbing" and contains "explosive material" in 2G spectrum allocation scam against Reliance Telecom.

Bhushan had also submitted before the court a copy of the entry register at Sinha's house which showed that some of the accused in 2G scam case were his "visitors".

Ranjit Sinha in his defence has told the top court earlier that all charges against him are "patently false".

Though he did not denied the home visits, but has said they were less frequent than claimed by some media reports, and that they did not influence him.

Giving reactions to media, CBI chief said, "I have met officials of Reliance but have I shown favour to anyone?"

He also described a visitors' diary from his home which will be reviewed by the Supreme Court on Thursday as "fake".

But the apex court’s bench comprising of Justices HL Dattu, SA Bobde and AM Sapre, before whom the petition has been made, on Tuesday took cognizance of Bhushan’s petition and sought 61-year-old Ranjit Sinha's response on why an SIT investigation should not be initiated against him for alleged conflict of interest in the probe.

The apex court asked the CBI director to file response in 10 days and posted the matter for further hearing on September 19.

Earlier on Thursday the SC ruled that the media has a right to publish the list of visitors to the house of Sinha, after he had appealed to the apex court to keep the records private.

It is noteworthy to mention that it was on CPIL’s petition that Supreme Court agreed to monitor the CBI's inquiry rupees two years ago into how and why telecom and coal resources were distributed without a transparent bidding process that cost the national exchequer lakhs of crores.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.