April 09, 2025 11:50 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Flight carrying 26/11 accused Tahawwur Rana departs US, to land in Delhi tomorrow | 2 brothers held for stabbing 19-year-old Himanshu in north Delhi over alleged affair with their sister | Bengal job losers launch massive state-wide protests snubbing Mamata's voluntary service appeal | NIA in US to get 26/11 Mumbai terror attack accused Tahawwur Rana's custody | Waqf Act is in the interest of the Muslim community: PM Modi | RBI cuts repo rate by 25 basis points to 6 percent after MPC meeting | After end of deadline, White House confirms 104 percent tariffs on China: Reports | Congress to undergo major organisational reshuffle, says KC Venugopal | Supreme Court raps TN Guv RN Ravi for withholding assent to 10 key bills, MK Stalin calls verdict 'historic | Waqf Law comes into effect, Supreme Court to hear petitions against it on April 16

SC refuses to hear PIL seeking checking of 100 per cent VVPAT slips

| @indiablooms | May 21, 2019, at 01:28 pm

New Delhi, May 21 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to hear a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a 100 per cent matching of Voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) slips with Electronic Voting Machines (EMVs) while counting of votes for Lok Sabha polls on May 23, media reports said.

A vacation bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra refused to entertain the plea which has already been dismissed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi.

On May 7, the Supreme Court rejected 21 anti-ruling parties' request to increase the counting of VVPAT machines from five to 25 per cent in the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections.

A bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, dismissed the review petitions.

On Apr 8, the Election Commission had argued during a hearing that the poll results will be delayed by five days if 50 per cent of total VVPATs are counted.

In its judgement, the Supreme Court had then increased the counting of paper trail machines from one to five, which didn't satisfy the club of opposition parties that had filed a review plea.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu