April 26, 2025 04:28 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'They'll figure it out': Donald Trump on fresh India-Pakistan border tension after Pahalgam attack | 'We are with you as you hunt down those responsible': US spy chief Tulsi Gabbard tells PM Modi on Pahalgam massacre | Centre defends Waqf laws in Supreme Court, says it would oppose any interim stay | Why was there no military deployment at Pahalgam? Opposition raises tough questions, Centre responds | Jammu and Kashmir: Top LeT commander Altaf Lalli killed during Bandipora encounter | Supreme Court warns Rahul Gandhi over his remarks against Veer Savarkar | Supreme Court warns Rahul Gandhi over his remarks against Veer Savarkar | Medha Patkar arrested in 24-year-old defamation case by Delhi L-G VK Saxena | J&K: Houses of two local LeT terrorists involved in Pahalgam terror attack demolished | Pakistan opens fire along LoC, Indian Army retaliates amid ongoing tension over Jammu and Kashmir terror attack
CAA

SC seeks Centre's response to petitions challenging CAA

| @indiablooms | Sep 13, 2022, at 12:29 am

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday sought detailed responses from the central government in a bunch of pleas challenging the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

"The Union of India (UOI) shall file appropriate responses with respect to segments of challenges. Let the needful be done in 4 weeks from today," the two-judge bench of the apex court, headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Uday Umesh Lalit, said.

The bench, also comprising Justice S Ravindra Bhat, said that so far as the state of Assam and Tripura is concerned, they shall file their compilation and complete pleadings within four weeks.

Their pleadings shall also be taken into consideration for the compilation and fixed the matter for further hearing to Oct 31.

The Supreme Court said that once the issues are identified and petitions are segregated, it will decide whether the matter will be referred to a three-judge bench or not.

The Supreme Court is hearing around 200 petitions challenging the CAA.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu