May 01, 2025 12:07 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh Supreme Court stays HC order granting bail to Chinmoy Krishna Das in sedition case | After Pahalgam terror attack, India warns Pakistan over 'unprovoked firing' along LoC: Report | PM Modi to skip Russia's Victory Day parade on May 9 in backdrop of Pahalgam attack | PM Modi holds top cabinet meetings amid India's wait for Pahalgam terror attack revenge | Fire in Kolkata hotel kills 14, police constitute SIT; local administration faces heat over 'negligence' | India will attack us in next 24-36 hours, claims Pakistan minister with warning of 'catastrophic consequences' | 3 killed, several injured in shooting incident in Sweden's Uppsala | BREAKING: PM Modi gives 'full freedom' to forces to avenge Pahalgam terror attack | Canada: Indian student Vanshika, who went missing for past few days, found dead | J&K govt closes 48 tourist locations as intel warns of more terror attacks after Pahalgam incident
Supreme Court

Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking clarification in Shaheen Bagh judgement

| @indiablooms | Jan 25, 2022, at 01:51 am

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an application seeking certain clarification in the Shaheen Bagh judgement, delivered by the apex court earlier.

"The judgement is self-speaking and no clarification is required, such applications are not maintainable," the Bench of the Apex Court, headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and also comprising Justice M M Sundresh, said, and dismissed the application filed by Syed Bahadur Abbas Naqvi, an intervenor in the main matter.

The Supreme Court had delivered the judgement in an appeal filed by Advocate Amit Sahni, seeking to remove the protests against the Citizenship Amendment-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) at Shaheen Bagh, alleging that the protests were blocking the roads, affecting the right of free movement of the public.

Though the protesters vacated the site in March with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the apex court had proceeded to hear the matter on the larger issue of balancing the right to protest with the right to free movement of people.

"The issue is over, why is it listed? What's the clarification sought I don't understand. There's no clarification required. The whole issue is over. Sorry. No clarification of a judgement. The judgement speaks for itself. Dismissed," the Supreme Court said and rejected the application filed by Syed Bahadur Abbas Naqvi, who was an intervenor in the main matter.

"We have dismissed this application, there is no need for clarification, and the judgement has been passed, such an application is not maintainable, we are not going to entertain such applications in disposed of matters." Justice Kaul told the Counsel, appearing for Naqvi.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu