March 03, 2025 02:03 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Crucial to have Trump’s support, says Zelenskyy a day after fiery White House exchange | 'We're looking for peace, Zelenskyy wants Russia-Ukraine war to continue': Donald Trump after White House public spat | Volodymyr Zelenskyy refuses to apologise to Donald Trump after public spat over Russia-Ukraine war | 'Make a deal or we are out': Donald Trump tells Volodymyr Zelenskyy at White House | Himachal govt seeks fund from temple to support welfare schemes, BJP calls move 'shocking' | Injustice to opposition MLAs: Atishi writes to Delhi Assembly Speaker on suspension of 21 AAP lawmakers | We will leave for US tomorrow: Father of Indian student Neelam Shinde after urgent visa grant | 'Not joining BJP or floating any party': Abhishek Banerjee dismisses rumours of his split from TMC | Pune bus rape accused arrested after 75-hour manhunt | Finance Secretary Tuhin Kanta Pandey appointed as new SEBI chief
Electoral Bonds
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court strikes down electoral bonds scheme, calls it 'unconstitutional'

| @indiablooms | Feb 15, 2024, at 05:09 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a landmark verdict months ahead of the Lok Sabha elections, the Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the electoral bonds scheme calling it "unconstitutional", media reports said.

The top court said the scheme violates the Right to Information and Section 19(1)(a).

"The Electoral bonds scheme has to be struck down as unconstitutional. It violates the right to information of citizens, about possible quid pro quo," the court remarked as quoted by NDTV.

The scheme, which was introduced during the Union Budget 2017-18, is a way to fund political parties in India.

In its order, the Supreme Court acknowledged that not all donations to political parties are made to change public policies as students and daily wagers contribute too.

However, the court said the contributions made by companies are "purely business transactions" and have greater influence on political processes.

The top court said as quoted by NDTV, "Before amendment, loss making companies were not able to contribute. The amendment does not recognize the harm of allowing loss-making companies to contribute due to quid pro quo.

"The amendment to Section 182 Companies Act is manifestly arbitrary for not making distinction between loss making and profit making companies."

Ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the primary opposition party Congress had promised to quash electoral bonds if the party was voted to power.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.