January 05, 2025 11:43 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bharatiya Janata Party releases first list of candidates for Delhi Assembly polls, fields Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma against Kejriwal | Firecracker unit explosion in Tamil Nadu's Virudhunagar kills 6 | Body of independent journalist, who went missing on Jan 1, found in a septic tank in Chhattisgarh | Delhi: 14-year-old student stabbed to death outside school after brawl with classmate | Rohit Sharma confirms he is not retiring amid speculations after skipping Sydney Test | India objects to China's 'new counties' announcement, says parts of these come under Ladakh | No cause for alarm over HMPV virus spread in China: Indian Health Agency | PM Modi gives a call for change in Delhi launching fierce attack on Arvind Kejriwal's AAP | Quran open to passage glorifying violence, bomb-making materials tracked in New Orleans attacker Shamshud-Din Jabbar's home | Jasprit Bumrah leads India in series decider after Rohit Sharma opts to rest in Sydney Test amid poor show with willow
Cairn Arbitration Award
Image Credit: wikipedia.org

Indian govt to challenge Hague tribunal's award in favour of Cairn

| @indiablooms | Mar 25, 2021, at 03:37 am

The Hague/IBNS: India is believed to have challenged the decision of a three-member tribunal at the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague dismissing its Rs 10, 247 crore tax claim on Cairn Energy Plc, said media reports.

The appeal was filed on Monday against the ruling that also asked the Indian government to return the share value it had sold, the dividends seized and tax refunds withheld.

This is the second time in three months that India has refused to accept the international award against retrospective ruling.

Media reports said British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is likely to press India to honour the ruling during his April 26 visit.

Earlier, Indian government had challenged a verdict by an international arbitration tribunal in Singapore that overturned its demand for Rs 22,100 crore in back taxes from Vodafone.

India has contended that Cairn had set up an abusive tax structure when it reorganised its business in India in 2006, and it did not pay taxes anywhere in the world on the gains made in India.

The finance ministry has made it clear that the issue of taxation is not a subject of bilateral investment treaties, such as the UK-India Bilateral Investment Treaty under which Cairn had sought reversing of the tax demand raised, and so the ruling should be challenged.

"The issue at stake is thus not a matter of domestic tax law, it is rather whether the fiscal measures taken by the state, valid or not under its own tax laws, violate international law," the Hague panel had said in a unanimous verdict, quoted media reports.

It noted that the 2012 law passed by the Indian government was a new law and not a clarification of a previous law that could be applied to earlier years.

Cairn has moved courts in nine countries to enforce the award and so far it has been recognised by the courts in US, the UK, Netherlands, Canada and France and is in the process in Singapore, Japan, the United Arab Emirates and the Cayman Islands.

With the recognition of the award, Cairn can take steps to seize assets owned by Indian government such as payments to state-owned entities, airplanes and ships in those jurisdictions,bank accounts, to recover the monies due to it, the media reports said, citing sources.

According to the Indian government, the international treaties are aimed at protecting investments while taxes are levied on the 'returns' earned by entities.

However, the Hague tribunal has rejected this claim.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.