January 04, 2025 03:15 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
India objects to China's 'new counties' announcement, says parts of these come under Ladakh | No cause for alarm over HMPV virus spread in China: Indian Health Agency | PM Modi gives a call for change in Delhi launching fierce attack on Arvind Kejriwal's AAP | Quran open to passage glorifying violence, bomb-making materials tracked in New Orleans attacker Shamshud-Din Jabbar's home | Jasprit Bumrah leads India in series decider after Rohit Sharma opts to rest in Sydney Test amid poor show with willow | Punjab cop dismissed for facilitating TV interview of Larence Bishnoi while in custody | 'Not Veer Savarkar', Congress student wing demands Delhi college be named after Manmohan Singh | 'Cowardly': PM Modi condemns New Orleans terrorist attack that killed 15 | Prashant Kishor starts fast unto death over Bihar Public Service Commission prelims cancellation demand | Bangladesh court denies bail to arrested Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das
Astrazeneca

AstraZeneca COVID jab 'less effective against South Africa variant': Reports

| @indiablooms | Feb 08, 2021, at 12:04 am

Johannesburg/UNI: According to reports the COVID-19 vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford offers only limited protection against the South African variant of the coronavirus, a spokesman for the British drugmaker said here on Sunday.

The statement came after the Financial Times reported that the vaccine failed to provide protection against the mild and moderate disease caused by the South African variant of the virus, Aljazeera reported.

The newspaper cited data from a trial conducted by South Africa’s University of the Witwatersrand and the University of Oxford, the findings of which are due to be published on Monday.

The FT noted that none of the more than 2,000 mainly healthy and young participants in the trial had been hospitalised or died. However, the findings are yet to be peer-reviewed.

However, the company said that it believed its vaccine could protect against severe disease, given that the neutralising antibody activity was equivalent to that of other COVID-19 vaccines that have demonstrated protection against severe disease.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.