October 18, 2026 07:15 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Internet access a fundamental right for children': SC rejects age-based 'blanket' ban | 'We will fight our own government': RG Kar victim's father threatens fresh protest after Sandip Ghosh gets bail | RG Kar shocker: Sandip Ghosh gets bail as only 7 of 147 witnesses examined, junior doctor blasts CBI | Trump waives Russia-related sanctions | 'How dare Elon Musk?' Owaisi defends Modi after billionaire's 'real boss' jibe at Ambani | 'B****y S***': IAS officer's abuse of female colleague during virtual J&K meeting sparks row | Aamir Khan’s nephew Imran Khan asked to leave India by Oct 28 after joining anti-CEC protest | ‘Their crime? Demanding justice’: Rahul Gandhi slams 4 AM detention of Ankita Bhandari’s parents | ‘Bangladesh showed us the way’: Neha Bora’s remarks spark BJP attack on Rahul Gandhi | Chingrighata flyover skid scare: Bikes fall, anti-skid blocks installed overnight as Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul faces criticism

Disadvantaged former smokers are more likely to use e-cigarettes to quit: Study

| @indiablooms | Jun 10, 2020, at 04:51 pm

People from lower socioeconomic groups in England have higher rates of e-cigarette use compared with more affluent groups among those who have quit smoking, according to a new UCL-led study. 

The study, published in JAMA Network Open and funded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK), analysed data from 34,442 people aged 16 and over who had formerly smoked.

The research team set out to find whether socio-economic position was associated with long-term ex-smokers use of e-cigarettes and whether the use changed over time. Long-term ex-smokers were defined as those who had given up smoking for more than one year.

They found that e-cigarette use increased from 3.3% in 2014 to 10.4% in 2019 for all long-term ex-smokers, but was around 60% more likely among those from disadvantaged groups. In 2019, 13.5% of those in lower socio-economic groups reported using e-cigarettes compared to 8.2% in more affluent groups.

The research team also found that it was rare for people to take up e-cigarettes after they had quit smoking. For example, of those who had quit smoking before 2011, only 0.8% in 2014 and 2.1% in 2019 reported using e-cigarettes. In this subgroup, there was no evidence of a link between socio-economic status and e-cigarette use.

Lead author, PhD candidate, Loren Kock (UCL Epidemiology & Health Care) explained: “Our previous research has shown that the use of e-cigarettes during a quit attempt is similar across different socioeconomic groups. However, this new work highlights that there is a difference in use by long-term ex-smokers.

“Our results suggest that more affluent ex-smokers are using e-cigarettes during a smoking quit attempt before discontinuing their use. In contrast, a greater proportion of ex-smokers in lower socio-economic groups may continue to use e-cigarettes following their smoking quit attempt.

“Socio-economically disadvantaged smokers are thought to be more dependent on nicotine, due to generally taking up smoking at a younger age and smoking more cigarettes per dayand such dependence might encourage greater use of e-cigarettes following quitting for pleasure, to satisfy cravings and potentially prevent relapse to smoking.”

Co-author, Professor Jamie Brown (UCL Epidemiology & Health Care and Co-Director of the UCL Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group) added: “We know e-cigarettes help people to quit smoking and are much less harmful than cigarettes. However further research is needed to understand the consequences of longer-term use by former smokers, particularly whether e-cigarette smoking affects a later return to cigarette smoking."

Image source: Pixabay

Image credit: Lindsay Fox/ https://ecigarettereviewed.com/blog/

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.