March 07, 2025 08:04 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Donald Trump pauses sweeping tariffs on Mexico until April 2 | Analysts warn of China advances in Myanmar, see Marco Rubio as key to US response | 'Strongly condemn': UK foreign office on S Jaishankar's security breach in London | US, Canada diplomats discuss trade amid new tariff announcement by Trump | US holds unprecedented secret talks with Hamas over release of American hostages being held in Gaza: Reports | 'No black mark on my career': IPS officer shocked over stepdaughter Ranya Rao's arrest in smuggling case | Will Europe arm Ukraine after the US halts military aid? | MK Stalin ‘rejects’ delimitation process at all-party meet, seeks status quo on Lok Sabha seats for 30 years | 9 civilians die as suicide bombers crash 2 explosive-laden cars into Pakistani army compound | Hyderabad techie dies by suicide after 6 months of wedding, family alleges dowry harrasment by husband

Talc-cancer case: Johnson & Johnson asked to pay $72m

| | Feb 24, 2016, at 08:51 pm
Missouri, Feb 24 (IBNS) A Missouri jury has directed Johnson & Johnson to pay $72m to the family of a woman whose death was allegedly linked to the use of a Baby Powder talc produced by the company, media reports said.

The woman, who was identified as Jackie Fox from Birmingham, Alabama, died after suffering from ovarian cancer in 2015.

She has been using the powder for several years.

She was 62.

"Her family's lawyers argued that the firm knew of cancer risks from the product and failed to warn consumers," BBC reported.

The company has denied charges leveled against it.

A spokeswoman was quoted as saying by BBC: "We have no higher responsibility than the health and safety of consumers, and we are disappointed with the outcome of the trial."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.