September 19, 2026 10:06 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Congress' Nandigram candidate arrested after Mamata's support amid TMC symbol row; Bengal bypoll gets chaotic | Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed

Ayodhya verdict: Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind files review petition

| @indiablooms | Dec 02, 2019, at 05:22 pm

New Delhi/UNI/IBNS: Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, through Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, the legal heir of the original plaintiff in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land (Title) dispute, on Monday filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgement on the Ayodhya case.

A five-judge constitution bench had given the judgement.

Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, legal heir of original Ayodhya land dispute litigant M Siddiq, filed the 217-page petition in the apex court seeking review of its November 9 judgment giving disputed land to Ram Lalla.

The main contention in the review petition of JUH is the title granted by 'disregarding' documentary evidence.

It has not been listed yet before the Supreme Court but may come up for hearing after Dec 9 and within a period of 15 days.

A five-judge constitution bench of the apex court had decreed that the disputed land be given to the Hindu side and a five-acre area in a different place to the Muslim side. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.