March 04, 2025 07:09 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Haryana Congress worker murder: Video emerges showing accused dragging suitcase with Himani Narwal's body inside it | Supreme Court slams 'oversmart' Samay Raina for making fun of proceedings in Canada, asks him to 'behave' | Indian woman facing death row in UAE for killing a child has been executed: Foreign ministry tells court | Crucial to have Trump’s support, says Zelenskyy a day after fiery White House exchange | 'We're looking for peace, Zelenskyy wants Russia-Ukraine war to continue': Donald Trump after White House public spat | Volodymyr Zelenskyy refuses to apologise to Donald Trump after public spat over Russia-Ukraine war | 'Make a deal or we are out': Donald Trump tells Volodymyr Zelenskyy at White House | Himachal govt seeks fund from temple to support welfare schemes, BJP calls move 'shocking' | Injustice to opposition MLAs: Atishi writes to Delhi Assembly Speaker on suspension of 21 AAP lawmakers | We will leave for US tomorrow: Father of Indian student Neelam Shinde after urgent visa grant
Covid-19

Cannot remain mute spectator over Covid crisis: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Apr 27, 2021, at 11:05 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it cannot be a mute spectator to the ongoing Covid crisis and its intervention should be taken into correct perspective.

The apex court last week took the suo moto cognizance of the Covid crisis.

Several people alleged that the top court is interfering in the matters of High Courts as the latter was also hearing cases related to the pandemic.

"At a time of national crisis, the Supreme Court cannot be a mute spectator," a bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, L Nageswara Rao and S Ravindra Bhat stated.

The apex court said the objective of the suo moto case was not to supplant the High Courts or to take over what they are doing.

"The role of the Supreme Court is complementary in nature. The issues which travail state boundaries is what this court will look into and thus Article 32 jurisdiction has been assumed," said the bench as quoted by LiveLaw.

"High Courts are best situated to make an assessment of ground realities in each state and find flexible solutions for the problems faced by citizens. Therefore, we see no reason or justification to interdict the High Courts," the Bench said.

The court further said that there is still a need for the Supreme Court to intervene on certain national issues, as there might be issues relating to coordination between states.
At least 11 High Courts in the country are dealing with issues related to Covid management in their respective jurisdiction.

The bench asked for a report from the Central Government on issues related to the supply of oxygen, essential drugs and vaccine pricing and fixed the next hearing on April 30, Friday.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.