October 16, 2026 08:46 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'How dare Elon Musk?' Owaisi defends Modi after billionaire's 'real boss' jibe at Ambani | 'B****y S***': IAS officer's abuse of female colleague during virtual J&K meeting sparks row | Aamir Khan’s nephew Imran Khan asked to leave India by Oct 28 after joining anti-CEC protest | ‘Their crime? Demanding justice’: Rahul Gandhi slams 4 AM detention of Ankita Bhandari’s parents | ‘Bangladesh showed us the way’: Neha Bora’s remarks spark BJP attack on Rahul Gandhi | Chingrighata flyover skid scare: Bikes fall, anti-skid blocks installed overnight as Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul faces criticism | Meerut blue drum murder case: Muskaan, her lover get death sentence | 'Rise up, young patriots!': American singer Mary Millben alleges CJP gets US funding, urges peaceful protests | 'Won't go unchallenged': Muhammad Yunus heckling in New York triggers legal action warning | flydubai cockpit attack probe widens: Two Maldivian pilots detained in UAE over links to Omani co-pilot
J&K
Supreme Court hears pleas seeking J&K statehood restoration. Photo: AI generated by ChatGPT

Can't ignore Pahalgam: Supreme Court on pleas seeking restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood

| @indiablooms | Aug 14, 2025, at 01:54 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to the recent Pahalgam terror attack underlining the "ground realities" hearing the pleas seeking the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood, media reports said.

A bench of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran was hearing the pleas that have sought direction to the central government to restore statehood of J&K, which was stripped off its special status in 2019.

The court was hearing the pleas filed by school teacher Zahoor Ahmed Bhat and activist Khurshid Ahmad Malik, who claimed the non-restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood is adversely impacting the residents.

Representing the central government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed the plea and said as quoted by Bar and Bench, "We assured statehood after elections. There is a peculiar position of this part of our country. I don’t know why this issue this agitated now.

"This particular State is not the correct State to muddy the water. I will still seek instructions. 8 weeks may be given."

Senior advocate Sankaranarayanan, who appeared for the petitioners, said as quoted by the media, "The judgment had trusted the government to grant Statehood. Restoration of Statehood was to be done after elections (in J&K). It has been 21 months since that judgment…"

After the SG pointed out the "peculiar position" of this part of the country, CJI Gavai said as quoted by Live Law, "You also have to take into consideration the ground realities; you cannot ignore what has happened in Pahalgam."

The court has adjourned the hearing for eight weeks.

"Let them file the response immediately after 8 weeks," the CJI said.

In a historic step, the central government on August 5, 2019 abrogated Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, which was bifurcated into two union territories- Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Last year, assembly elections were held in Jammu and Kashmir after 10 years. The National Conference-Congress government is currently in power.

The valley, which was witnessing a decline in terror incidents, was shocked when 26 tourists were killed in a terrorist attack at Baisaran Valley in Pahalgam on April 22.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.