October 14, 2026 09:57 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Punjab activist confronts chemist over alleged drug sales, shot dead during Facebook Live | ‘Rahul Gandhi pushed me during protest march’: Pregnant journalist’s allegation sparks BJP-Congress faceoff | ‘You cannot denotify resistance': CJP leaders Ashutosh Ranka, Saurav Das jump Jantar Mantar gate to protest, detained | Delhi Police de-notifies Jantar Mantar as protest site amid CJP stir over Gyanesh Kumar | 'Gyanesh Kumar will not escape': Rahul Gandhi issues warning amid voting rights row | 'Supreme Court doors open for all': CJI Surya Kant breaks silence on refusing to meet INDIA bloc over Gyanesh Kumar row | 'Undeclared Emer-GenZ': Shashi Tharoor slams Delhi curbs over CJP protests, calls internet shutdown 'most regressive' | ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’, ‘Inquilab Zindabad’: CJP leader Abhijeet Dipke dares Delhi Police to arrest him, says ‘We are not afraid’ | CJP protest crackdown? Abhijeet Dipke, Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka detained from inside flight | Dhruv Rathee detained ahead of CJP protests against CEC Gyanesh Kumar as Delhi goes on high alert
Citizenship
Supreme Court makes a significant observation on deciding citizenship. Photo: Supreme Court website & ChatGPT

'Citizenship must be decided fairly': Supreme Court quashes Gauhati HC order declaring 27 as foreigners

| @indiablooms | Jul 13, 2026, at 12:35 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Monday stressed that the determination of citizenship and foreigner status must be carried out through a "fair, lawful and reasonable" process, while setting aside a Gauhati High Court order that had upheld the declaration of 27 individuals as foreigners, media reports said.

Background of the Case

The case relates to 27 individuals who had challenged an ex parte order of a Foreigners Tribunal declaring them foreigners.

The Gauhati High Court had dismissed their petitions, observing that the appeals had been filed 23 years after the tribunal's order.

The High Court also noted that the petitioners had failed to appear before the tribunal despite repeated notices.

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order

A Bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta allowed the appeals and remanded the cases to the respective Foreigners Tribunals for fresh adjudication.

The apex court observed that questions relating to citizenship carry profound constitutional significance and therefore require a process that is fair, lawful and reasonable.

Court Balances Individual Rights and State Interest

While emphasising procedural fairness, the Supreme Court also recognised the State's legitimate interest in preventing illegal claims to Indian citizenship.

"Citizenship and foreigner status occupy a field of high constitutional and legal significance," the Bench said, as quoted by Live Law.

"The State has a legitimate and compelling interest in ensuring that persons who are not legally entitled to claim Indian citizenship do not secure such status by misuse of process, by false claim or by taking advantage of delays," the court added.

The Bench further observed: "At the same time, the determination of such status must be made through a process which is fair, lawful and reasonable. The statutory burden under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 remains fully applicable."

No Automatic Relief for Petitioners

The Supreme Court clarified that sending the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunals should not be construed as granting any equitable relief to the 27 individuals.

Instead, the tribunals have been directed to reconsider the cases afresh in accordance with law, while ensuring due process is followed.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.